Checks for understanding target language Students explain reasoning Exit ticket uses academic language Peer collaboration encouraged Graphic organizer used Student self‑ assessment Differentiation for mixed proficiency Prompt alignment to objective Teacher models academic vocabulary Modeling of exemplar response Language function (justify/compare) explicit Sentence starters visible Teacher rephrases for clarity Student uses sentence frames Leaning Objectives /Success criteria stated clearly Academic talk stems posted Vocabulary pre‑teach Tiered vocabulary list used Student‑to‑ student discourse Think‑aloud / I do, We do, You do Technology integration Visual supports provided Multiple modalities (oral/written) Warm/cool feedback modeled Standards referenced Checks for understanding target language Students explain reasoning Exit ticket uses academic language Peer collaboration encouraged Graphic organizer used Student self‑ assessment Differentiation for mixed proficiency Prompt alignment to objective Teacher models academic vocabulary Modeling of exemplar response Language function (justify/compare) explicit Sentence starters visible Teacher rephrases for clarity Student uses sentence frames Leaning Objectives /Success criteria stated clearly Academic talk stems posted Vocabulary pre‑teach Tiered vocabulary list used Student‑to‑ student discourse Think‑aloud / I do, We do, You do Technology integration Visual supports provided Multiple modalities (oral/written) Warm/cool feedback modeled Standards referenced
(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
Checks for understanding target language
Students explain reasoning
Exit ticket uses academic language
Peer collaboration encouraged
Graphic organizer used
Student self‑ assessment
Differentiation for mixed proficiency
Prompt alignment to objective
Teacher models academic vocabulary
Modeling of exemplar response
Language function (justify/compare) explicit
Sentence starters visible
Teacher rephrases for clarity
Student uses sentence frames
Leaning Objectives /Success criteria stated clearly
Academic talk stems posted
Vocabulary pre‑teach
Tiered vocabulary list used
Student‑to‑ student discourse
Think‑aloud / I do, We do, You do
Technology integration
Visual supports provided
Multiple modalities (oral/written)
Warm/cool feedback modeled
Standards referenced