Technology integration Teacher rephrases for clarity Warm/cool feedback modeled Language function (justify/compare) explicit Peer collaboration encouraged Differentiation for mixed proficiency Exit ticket uses academic language Standards referenced Leaning Objectives /Success criteria stated clearly Students explain reasoning Academic talk stems posted Visual supports provided Vocabulary pre‑teach Checks for understanding target language Multiple modalities (oral/written) Student uses sentence frames Prompt alignment to objective Graphic organizer used Think‑aloud / I do, We do, You do Student‑to‑ student discourse Teacher models academic vocabulary Student self‑ assessment Sentence starters visible Tiered vocabulary list used Modeling of exemplar response Technology integration Teacher rephrases for clarity Warm/cool feedback modeled Language function (justify/compare) explicit Peer collaboration encouraged Differentiation for mixed proficiency Exit ticket uses academic language Standards referenced Leaning Objectives /Success criteria stated clearly Students explain reasoning Academic talk stems posted Visual supports provided Vocabulary pre‑teach Checks for understanding target language Multiple modalities (oral/written) Student uses sentence frames Prompt alignment to objective Graphic organizer used Think‑aloud / I do, We do, You do Student‑to‑ student discourse Teacher models academic vocabulary Student self‑ assessment Sentence starters visible Tiered vocabulary list used Modeling of exemplar response
(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
Technology integration
Teacher rephrases for clarity
Warm/cool feedback modeled
Language function (justify/compare) explicit
Peer collaboration encouraged
Differentiation for mixed proficiency
Exit ticket uses academic language
Standards referenced
Leaning Objectives /Success criteria stated clearly
Students explain reasoning
Academic talk stems posted
Visual supports provided
Vocabulary pre‑teach
Checks for understanding target language
Multiple modalities (oral/written)
Student uses sentence frames
Prompt alignment to objective
Graphic organizer used
Think‑aloud / I do, We do, You do
Student‑to‑ student discourse
Teacher models academic vocabulary
Student self‑ assessment
Sentence starters visible
Tiered vocabulary list used
Modeling of exemplar response