valuejudgementstatedaccountabilityemphaziedbiasidentifiedpunishmentvspreventioncontrastedharm vsintentdistinguishedhumandignityrefrencesstigmataismentionedgroupconsensusattempthypotheticalscenario"it runs inthe family"mentionedvictimperspectiveraisedborncriminalsarementionedgenes/geneticsarementionedfairness vseffectivenesstrade-off"itdepends"momentstatementwith noevidence tosupport itspeakerchangespositioncorrelationvscausationmoralresponsibilitydiscussedsocialinequalitymentionedaudiencereactiontrade offknowledgedisagrementexpert orauthorityreferencedvaluejudgementstatedaccountabilityemphaziedbiasidentifiedpunishmentvspreventioncontrastedharm vsintentdistinguishedhumandignityrefrencesstigmataismentionedgroupconsensusattempthypotheticalscenario"it runs inthe family"mentionedvictimperspectiveraisedborncriminalsarementionedgenes/geneticsarementionedfairness vseffectivenesstrade-off"itdepends"momentstatementwith noevidence tosupport itspeakerchangespositioncorrelationvscausationmoralresponsibilitydiscussedsocialinequalitymentionedaudiencereactiontrade offknowledgedisagrementexpert orauthorityreferenced

Criminological Theory - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. value judgement stated
  2. accountability emphazied
  3. bias identified
  4. punishment vs prevention contrasted
  5. harm vs intent distinguished
  6. human dignity refrences
  7. stigmata is mentioned
  8. group consensus attempt
  9. hypothetical scenario
  10. "it runs in the family" mentioned
  11. victim perspective raised
  12. born criminals are mentioned
  13. genes/ genetics are mentioned
  14. fairness vs effectiveness trade-off
  15. "it depends" moment
  16. statement with no evidence to support it
  17. speaker changes position
  18. correlation vs causation
  19. moral responsibility discussed
  20. social inequality mentioned
  21. audience reaction
  22. trade off knowledge
  23. disagrement
  24. expert or authority referenced