"itdepends"momenthumandignityrefrencesbiasidentifiedharm vsintentdistinguishedvictimperspectiveraiseddisagrementstatementwith noevidence tosupport ittrade offknowledgeborncriminalsarementionedpunishmentvspreventioncontrastedsocialinequalitymentionedcorrelationvscausationaudiencereactionmoralresponsibilitydiscussedvaluejudgementstatedexpert orauthorityreferencedgroupconsensusattemptstigmataismentionedfairness vseffectivenesstrade-offaccountabilityemphaziedspeakerchangesposition"it runs inthe family"mentionedgenes/geneticsarementionedhypotheticalscenario"itdepends"momenthumandignityrefrencesbiasidentifiedharm vsintentdistinguishedvictimperspectiveraiseddisagrementstatementwith noevidence tosupport ittrade offknowledgeborncriminalsarementionedpunishmentvspreventioncontrastedsocialinequalitymentionedcorrelationvscausationaudiencereactionmoralresponsibilitydiscussedvaluejudgementstatedexpert orauthorityreferencedgroupconsensusattemptstigmataismentionedfairness vseffectivenesstrade-offaccountabilityemphaziedspeakerchangesposition"it runs inthe family"mentionedgenes/geneticsarementionedhypotheticalscenario

Criminological Theory - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. "it depends" moment
  2. human dignity refrences
  3. bias identified
  4. harm vs intent distinguished
  5. victim perspective raised
  6. disagrement
  7. statement with no evidence to support it
  8. trade off knowledge
  9. born criminals are mentioned
  10. punishment vs prevention contrasted
  11. social inequality mentioned
  12. correlation vs causation
  13. audience reaction
  14. moral responsibility discussed
  15. value judgement stated
  16. expert or authority referenced
  17. group consensus attempt
  18. stigmata is mentioned
  19. fairness vs effectiveness trade-off
  20. accountability emphazied
  21. speaker changes position
  22. "it runs in the family" mentioned
  23. genes/ genetics are mentioned
  24. hypothetical scenario