expert orauthorityreferencedsocialinequalitymentionedhumandignityrefrencesaccountabilityemphaziedfairness vseffectivenesstrade-offstatementwith noevidence tosupport itaudiencereactionspeakerchangesposition"it runs inthe family"mentionedcorrelationvscausationgenes/geneticsarementionedstigmataismentionedmoralresponsibilitydiscussedgroupconsensusattempthypotheticalscenarioharm vsintentdistinguishedbiasidentifiedpunishmentvspreventioncontrastedborncriminalsarementionedvaluejudgementstated"itdepends"momenttrade offknowledgedisagrementvictimperspectiveraisedexpert orauthorityreferencedsocialinequalitymentionedhumandignityrefrencesaccountabilityemphaziedfairness vseffectivenesstrade-offstatementwith noevidence tosupport itaudiencereactionspeakerchangesposition"it runs inthe family"mentionedcorrelationvscausationgenes/geneticsarementionedstigmataismentionedmoralresponsibilitydiscussedgroupconsensusattempthypotheticalscenarioharm vsintentdistinguishedbiasidentifiedpunishmentvspreventioncontrastedborncriminalsarementionedvaluejudgementstated"itdepends"momenttrade offknowledgedisagrementvictimperspectiveraised

Criminological Theory - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. expert or authority referenced
  2. social inequality mentioned
  3. human dignity refrences
  4. accountability emphazied
  5. fairness vs effectiveness trade-off
  6. statement with no evidence to support it
  7. audience reaction
  8. speaker changes position
  9. "it runs in the family" mentioned
  10. correlation vs causation
  11. genes/ genetics are mentioned
  12. stigmata is mentioned
  13. moral responsibility discussed
  14. group consensus attempt
  15. hypothetical scenario
  16. harm vs intent distinguished
  17. bias identified
  18. punishment vs prevention contrasted
  19. born criminals are mentioned
  20. value judgement stated
  21. "it depends" moment
  22. trade off knowledge
  23. disagrement
  24. victim perspective raised