borncriminalsarementionedgenes/geneticsarementioned"it runs inthe family"mentionedspeakerchangespositionbiasidentifiedhypotheticalscenariohumandignityrefrencesdisagrementvictimperspectiveraisedharm vsintentdistinguished"itdepends"momentfairness vseffectivenesstrade-offtrade offknowledgeexpert orauthorityreferencedstigmataismentionedaudiencereactionstatementwith noevidence tosupport itaccountabilityemphaziedpunishmentvspreventioncontrastedgroupconsensusattemptcorrelationvscausationvaluejudgementstatedsocialinequalitymentionedmoralresponsibilitydiscussedborncriminalsarementionedgenes/geneticsarementioned"it runs inthe family"mentionedspeakerchangespositionbiasidentifiedhypotheticalscenariohumandignityrefrencesdisagrementvictimperspectiveraisedharm vsintentdistinguished"itdepends"momentfairness vseffectivenesstrade-offtrade offknowledgeexpert orauthorityreferencedstigmataismentionedaudiencereactionstatementwith noevidence tosupport itaccountabilityemphaziedpunishmentvspreventioncontrastedgroupconsensusattemptcorrelationvscausationvaluejudgementstatedsocialinequalitymentionedmoralresponsibilitydiscussed

Criminological Theory - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. born criminals are mentioned
  2. genes/ genetics are mentioned
  3. "it runs in the family" mentioned
  4. speaker changes position
  5. bias identified
  6. hypothetical scenario
  7. human dignity refrences
  8. disagrement
  9. victim perspective raised
  10. harm vs intent distinguished
  11. "it depends" moment
  12. fairness vs effectiveness trade-off
  13. trade off knowledge
  14. expert or authority referenced
  15. stigmata is mentioned
  16. audience reaction
  17. statement with no evidence to support it
  18. accountability emphazied
  19. punishment vs prevention contrasted
  20. group consensus attempt
  21. correlation vs causation
  22. value judgement stated
  23. social inequality mentioned
  24. moral responsibility discussed