stigmataismentionedvictimperspectiveraisedspeakerchangesposition"it runs inthe family"mentionedpunishmentvspreventioncontrasteddisagrementbiasidentifiedharm vsintentdistinguishedhumandignityrefrencesvaluejudgementstatedaccountabilityemphaziedaudiencereactionhypotheticalscenariotrade offknowledgegenes/geneticsarementionedborncriminalsarementionedstatementwith noevidence tosupport itfairness vseffectivenesstrade-off"itdepends"momentgroupconsensusattemptmoralresponsibilitydiscussedsocialinequalitymentionedcorrelationvscausationexpert orauthorityreferencedstigmataismentionedvictimperspectiveraisedspeakerchangesposition"it runs inthe family"mentionedpunishmentvspreventioncontrasteddisagrementbiasidentifiedharm vsintentdistinguishedhumandignityrefrencesvaluejudgementstatedaccountabilityemphaziedaudiencereactionhypotheticalscenariotrade offknowledgegenes/geneticsarementionedborncriminalsarementionedstatementwith noevidence tosupport itfairness vseffectivenesstrade-off"itdepends"momentgroupconsensusattemptmoralresponsibilitydiscussedsocialinequalitymentionedcorrelationvscausationexpert orauthorityreferenced

Criminological Theory - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. stigmata is mentioned
  2. victim perspective raised
  3. speaker changes position
  4. "it runs in the family" mentioned
  5. punishment vs prevention contrasted
  6. disagrement
  7. bias identified
  8. harm vs intent distinguished
  9. human dignity refrences
  10. value judgement stated
  11. accountability emphazied
  12. audience reaction
  13. hypothetical scenario
  14. trade off knowledge
  15. genes/ genetics are mentioned
  16. born criminals are mentioned
  17. statement with no evidence to support it
  18. fairness vs effectiveness trade-off
  19. "it depends" moment
  20. group consensus attempt
  21. moral responsibility discussed
  22. social inequality mentioned
  23. correlation vs causation
  24. expert or authority referenced