harm vsintentdistinguishedstatementwith noevidence tosupport itaccountabilityemphaziedaudiencereactiongenes/geneticsarementioneddisagrementcorrelationvscausation"it runs inthe family"mentionedbiasidentifiedvaluejudgementstated"itdepends"momenthypotheticalscenarioborncriminalsarementionedgroupconsensusattemptsocialinequalitymentionedtrade offknowledgefairness vseffectivenesstrade-offspeakerchangespositionpunishmentvspreventioncontrastedvictimperspectiveraisedmoralresponsibilitydiscussedstigmataismentionedexpert orauthorityreferencedhumandignityrefrencesharm vsintentdistinguishedstatementwith noevidence tosupport itaccountabilityemphaziedaudiencereactiongenes/geneticsarementioneddisagrementcorrelationvscausation"it runs inthe family"mentionedbiasidentifiedvaluejudgementstated"itdepends"momenthypotheticalscenarioborncriminalsarementionedgroupconsensusattemptsocialinequalitymentionedtrade offknowledgefairness vseffectivenesstrade-offspeakerchangespositionpunishmentvspreventioncontrastedvictimperspectiveraisedmoralresponsibilitydiscussedstigmataismentionedexpert orauthorityreferencedhumandignityrefrences

Criminological Theory - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. harm vs intent distinguished
  2. statement with no evidence to support it
  3. accountability emphazied
  4. audience reaction
  5. genes/ genetics are mentioned
  6. disagrement
  7. correlation vs causation
  8. "it runs in the family" mentioned
  9. bias identified
  10. value judgement stated
  11. "it depends" moment
  12. hypothetical scenario
  13. born criminals are mentioned
  14. group consensus attempt
  15. social inequality mentioned
  16. trade off knowledge
  17. fairness vs effectiveness trade-off
  18. speaker changes position
  19. punishment vs prevention contrasted
  20. victim perspective raised
  21. moral responsibility discussed
  22. stigmata is mentioned
  23. expert or authority referenced
  24. human dignity refrences