accountability emphazied trade off knowledge "it depends" moment group consensus attempt born criminals are mentioned statement with no evidence to support it fairness vs effectiveness trade-off audience reaction speaker changes position human dignity refrences disagrement correlation vs causation stigmata is mentioned expert or authority referenced harm vs intent distinguished victim perspective raised genes/ genetics are mentioned "it runs in the family" mentioned bias identified social inequality mentioned hypothetical scenario moral responsibility discussed value judgement stated punishment vs prevention contrasted accountability emphazied trade off knowledge "it depends" moment group consensus attempt born criminals are mentioned statement with no evidence to support it fairness vs effectiveness trade-off audience reaction speaker changes position human dignity refrences disagrement correlation vs causation stigmata is mentioned expert or authority referenced harm vs intent distinguished victim perspective raised genes/ genetics are mentioned "it runs in the family" mentioned bias identified social inequality mentioned hypothetical scenario moral responsibility discussed value judgement stated punishment vs prevention contrasted
(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
accountability emphazied
trade off knowledge
"it depends" moment
group consensus attempt
born criminals are mentioned
statement with no evidence to support it
fairness vs effectiveness trade-off
audience reaction
speaker changes position
human dignity refrences
disagrement
correlation vs causation
stigmata is mentioned
expert or authority referenced
harm vs intent distinguished
victim perspective raised
genes/ genetics are mentioned
"it runs in the family" mentioned
bias identified
social inequality mentioned
hypothetical scenario
moral responsibility discussed
value judgement stated
punishment vs prevention contrasted