This bingo card has 16 words: 5th page of google scholar because there WILL be science supporting your argument, "we have previously demonstrated", review cites another review that's meant to be a primary source, has read the same introduction at least 40 times, after reading a paper for an hour, you realise its too irrelevant, seeing the same author pop up in many papers, and wondering what they're like in person, ctrl+f: "insert protein in your topic title here", cites a review, is 1968 too far back?, find a nugget of info, write it in 7 places so you don't forget it exists, "the precise molecular mechanism is yet to be elucidated", "this is consistent with our recent findings that X+Y = Z (data yet to be published) ", you succesfully predict a paper is a review based on the title alone, why has that author got such a weird name?, only paper from the last 5 years is a review, citing primary sources from > 5 years ago and give up on google scholar, and having the false hope that ifind will do any better for you.
lit review 2020 | GO WILD and pick a book.... | GO WILD and pick a book.... | Book Bingo | PhD Bingo
Share this URL with your players:
For more control of your online game, create a clone of this card first.
Learn how to conduct a bingo game.
With players vying for a you'll have to call about __ items before someone wins. There's a __% chance that a lucky player would win after calling __ items.
Tip: If you want your game to last longer (on average), add more unique words/images to it.
