cites areviewhas read thesameintroductionat least 40timesyou succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle aloneseeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inperson"we havepreviouslydemonstrated"ctrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here"give up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for you"this is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished) "find a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it exists5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargument"the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"only paper fromthe last 5 yearsis a review,citing primarysources from >5 years agoreview citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysourceafter reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevantis 1968too farback?why has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?cites areviewhas read thesameintroductionat least 40timesyou succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle aloneseeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inperson"we havepreviouslydemonstrated"ctrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here"give up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for you"this is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished) "find a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it exists5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargument"the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"only paper fromthe last 5 yearsis a review,citing primarysources from >5 years agoreview citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysourceafter reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevantis 1968too farback?why has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?

lit review 2020 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. cites a review
  2. has read the same introduction at least 40 times
  3. you succesfully predict a paper is a review based on the title alone
  4. seeing the same author pop up in many papers, and wondering what they're like in person
  5. "we have previously demonstrated"
  6. ctrl+f: "insert protein in your topic title here"
  7. give up on google scholar, and having the false hope that ifind will do any better for you
  8. "this is consistent with our recent findings that X+Y = Z (data yet to be published) "
  9. find a nugget of info, write it in 7 places so you don't forget it exists
  10. 5th page of google scholar because there WILL be science supporting your argument
  11. "the precise molecular mechanism is yet to be elucidated"
  12. only paper from the last 5 years is a review, citing primary sources from > 5 years ago
  13. review cites another review that's meant to be a primary source
  14. after reading a paper for an hour, you realise its too irrelevant
  15. is 1968 too far back?
  16. why has that author got such a weird name?