why has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?cites areviewctrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here"only paper fromthe last 5 yearsis a review,citing primarysources from >5 years ago"this is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished) "after reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevant5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargumentis 1968too farback?you succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle alonegive up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for youseeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inperson"we havepreviouslydemonstrated"review citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysourcefind a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it exists"the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"has read thesameintroductionat least 40timeswhy has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?cites areviewctrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here"only paper fromthe last 5 yearsis a review,citing primarysources from >5 years ago"this is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished) "after reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevant5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargumentis 1968too farback?you succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle alonegive up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for youseeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inperson"we havepreviouslydemonstrated"review citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysourcefind a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it exists"the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"has read thesameintroductionat least 40times

lit review 2020 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. why has that author got such a weird name?
  2. cites a review
  3. ctrl+f: "insert protein in your topic title here"
  4. only paper from the last 5 years is a review, citing primary sources from > 5 years ago
  5. "this is consistent with our recent findings that X+Y = Z (data yet to be published) "
  6. after reading a paper for an hour, you realise its too irrelevant
  7. 5th page of google scholar because there WILL be science supporting your argument
  8. is 1968 too far back?
  9. you succesfully predict a paper is a review based on the title alone
  10. give up on google scholar, and having the false hope that ifind will do any better for you
  11. seeing the same author pop up in many papers, and wondering what they're like in person
  12. "we have previously demonstrated"
  13. review cites another review that's meant to be a primary source
  14. find a nugget of info, write it in 7 places so you don't forget it exists
  15. "the precise molecular mechanism is yet to be elucidated"
  16. has read the same introduction at least 40 times