only paper fromthe last 5 yearsis a review,citing primarysources from >5 years agogive up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for youhas read thesameintroductionat least 40times"the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"find a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it exists"this is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished) ""we havepreviouslydemonstrated"seeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inpersonctrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here"you succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle aloneis 1968too farback?after reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevantcites areviewwhy has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?review citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysource5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargumentonly paper fromthe last 5 yearsis a review,citing primarysources from >5 years agogive up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for youhas read thesameintroductionat least 40times"the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"find a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it exists"this is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished) ""we havepreviouslydemonstrated"seeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inpersonctrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here"you succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle aloneis 1968too farback?after reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevantcites areviewwhy has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?review citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysource5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargument

lit review 2020 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. only paper from the last 5 years is a review, citing primary sources from > 5 years ago
  2. give up on google scholar, and having the false hope that ifind will do any better for you
  3. has read the same introduction at least 40 times
  4. "the precise molecular mechanism is yet to be elucidated"
  5. find a nugget of info, write it in 7 places so you don't forget it exists
  6. "this is consistent with our recent findings that X+Y = Z (data yet to be published) "
  7. "we have previously demonstrated"
  8. seeing the same author pop up in many papers, and wondering what they're like in person
  9. ctrl+f: "insert protein in your topic title here"
  10. you succesfully predict a paper is a review based on the title alone
  11. is 1968 too far back?
  12. after reading a paper for an hour, you realise its too irrelevant
  13. cites a review
  14. why has that author got such a weird name?
  15. review cites another review that's meant to be a primary source
  16. 5th page of google scholar because there WILL be science supporting your argument