seeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inpersonyou succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle alonefind a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it existsreview citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysource"we havepreviouslydemonstrated"only paper fromthe last 5 yearsis a review,citing primarysources from >5 years agowhy has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?is 1968too farback?has read thesameintroductionat least 40timesctrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here"5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargumentafter reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevant"this is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished) ""the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"cites areviewgive up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for youseeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inpersonyou succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle alonefind a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it existsreview citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysource"we havepreviouslydemonstrated"only paper fromthe last 5 yearsis a review,citing primarysources from >5 years agowhy has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?is 1968too farback?has read thesameintroductionat least 40timesctrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here"5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargumentafter reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevant"this is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished) ""the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"cites areviewgive up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for you

lit review 2020 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. seeing the same author pop up in many papers, and wondering what they're like in person
  2. you succesfully predict a paper is a review based on the title alone
  3. find a nugget of info, write it in 7 places so you don't forget it exists
  4. review cites another review that's meant to be a primary source
  5. "we have previously demonstrated"
  6. only paper from the last 5 years is a review, citing primary sources from > 5 years ago
  7. why has that author got such a weird name?
  8. is 1968 too far back?
  9. has read the same introduction at least 40 times
  10. ctrl+f: "insert protein in your topic title here"
  11. 5th page of google scholar because there WILL be science supporting your argument
  12. after reading a paper for an hour, you realise its too irrelevant
  13. "this is consistent with our recent findings that X+Y = Z (data yet to be published) "
  14. "the precise molecular mechanism is yet to be elucidated"
  15. cites a review
  16. give up on google scholar, and having the false hope that ifind will do any better for you