cites areviewonly paper fromthe last 5 yearsis a review,citing primarysources from >5 years agoafter reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevantctrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here"give up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for you5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargumentyou succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle aloneseeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inpersonreview citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysourcefind a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it exists"the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"is 1968too farback?"this is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished) "has read thesameintroductionat least 40timeswhy has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?"we havepreviouslydemonstrated"cites areviewonly paper fromthe last 5 yearsis a review,citing primarysources from >5 years agoafter reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevantctrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here"give up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for you5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargumentyou succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle aloneseeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inpersonreview citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysourcefind a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it exists"the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"is 1968too farback?"this is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished) "has read thesameintroductionat least 40timeswhy has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?"we havepreviouslydemonstrated"

lit review 2020 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. cites a review
  2. only paper from the last 5 years is a review, citing primary sources from > 5 years ago
  3. after reading a paper for an hour, you realise its too irrelevant
  4. ctrl+f: "insert protein in your topic title here"
  5. give up on google scholar, and having the false hope that ifind will do any better for you
  6. 5th page of google scholar because there WILL be science supporting your argument
  7. you succesfully predict a paper is a review based on the title alone
  8. seeing the same author pop up in many papers, and wondering what they're like in person
  9. review cites another review that's meant to be a primary source
  10. find a nugget of info, write it in 7 places so you don't forget it exists
  11. "the precise molecular mechanism is yet to be elucidated"
  12. is 1968 too far back?
  13. "this is consistent with our recent findings that X+Y = Z (data yet to be published) "
  14. has read the same introduction at least 40 times
  15. why has that author got such a weird name?
  16. "we have previously demonstrated"