has read thesameintroductionat least 40times5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargumentgive up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for youonly paper fromthe last 5 yearsis a review,citing primarysources from >5 years agofind a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it existsafter reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevantis 1968too farback?"the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"you succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle aloneseeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inpersonreview citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysourcectrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here""this is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished) ""we havepreviouslydemonstrated"cites areviewwhy has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?has read thesameintroductionat least 40times5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargumentgive up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for youonly paper fromthe last 5 yearsis a review,citing primarysources from >5 years agofind a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it existsafter reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevantis 1968too farback?"the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"you succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle aloneseeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inpersonreview citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysourcectrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here""this is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished) ""we havepreviouslydemonstrated"cites areviewwhy has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?

lit review 2020 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. has read the same introduction at least 40 times
  2. 5th page of google scholar because there WILL be science supporting your argument
  3. give up on google scholar, and having the false hope that ifind will do any better for you
  4. only paper from the last 5 years is a review, citing primary sources from > 5 years ago
  5. find a nugget of info, write it in 7 places so you don't forget it exists
  6. after reading a paper for an hour, you realise its too irrelevant
  7. is 1968 too far back?
  8. "the precise molecular mechanism is yet to be elucidated"
  9. you succesfully predict a paper is a review based on the title alone
  10. seeing the same author pop up in many papers, and wondering what they're like in person
  11. review cites another review that's meant to be a primary source
  12. ctrl+f: "insert protein in your topic title here"
  13. "this is consistent with our recent findings that X+Y = Z (data yet to be published) "
  14. "we have previously demonstrated"
  15. cites a review
  16. why has that author got such a weird name?