you succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle alone"the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"ctrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here"only paper fromthe last 5 yearsis a review,citing primarysources from >5 years ago"we havepreviouslydemonstrated"give up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for youafter reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevant"this is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished) "find a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it existswhy has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?seeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inpersoncites areviewhas read thesameintroductionat least 40timesis 1968too farback?5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargumentreview citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysourceyou succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle alone"the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"ctrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here"only paper fromthe last 5 yearsis a review,citing primarysources from >5 years ago"we havepreviouslydemonstrated"give up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for youafter reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevant"this is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished) "find a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it existswhy has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?seeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inpersoncites areviewhas read thesameintroductionat least 40timesis 1968too farback?5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargumentreview citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysource

lit review 2020 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. you succesfully predict a paper is a review based on the title alone
  2. "the precise molecular mechanism is yet to be elucidated"
  3. ctrl+f: "insert protein in your topic title here"
  4. only paper from the last 5 years is a review, citing primary sources from > 5 years ago
  5. "we have previously demonstrated"
  6. give up on google scholar, and having the false hope that ifind will do any better for you
  7. after reading a paper for an hour, you realise its too irrelevant
  8. "this is consistent with our recent findings that X+Y = Z (data yet to be published) "
  9. find a nugget of info, write it in 7 places so you don't forget it exists
  10. why has that author got such a weird name?
  11. seeing the same author pop up in many papers, and wondering what they're like in person
  12. cites a review
  13. has read the same introduction at least 40 times
  14. is 1968 too far back?
  15. 5th page of google scholar because there WILL be science supporting your argument
  16. review cites another review that's meant to be a primary source