This bingo card has a free space and 24 words: Uses studies they haven't read as evidence, Argues against their own points without realizing it, Incapable of using a search engine instead of begging for a citation, Wall of text for simple point, Makes arguments which rely on their specific moral assumptions, Obscurantism, Presents statistics in isolation of known causal factors, Expresses high levels of certainty on matters he couldn't possibly know, /r/IAmVerySmart, Fallacy Man!, Would ask for a citation if you said the sky is blue, If opponent expresses his argument in their own words for clarification, cries "strawman!", Concludes causal relationships based on grossly insufficient statistical evidence, Brings all discussion back to one of a handful of pet issues, "You wouldn't understand", "Saying I don't understand something is an ad-hominem attack", No interest in learning from his interlocutor, "That's not what I said", but that is actually what they said., Uses circular reasoning to justify their assumptions, Hat,tie,or other formal wear in DP, Name-drops philosophers whose works usually don't actually support their point(s), Will debate literally anything -physically incapable of not having an opinion on a subject, Oblivious to second and third order effects and Has never admitted fault in their life.
Socratic Seminar Bingo | ACCOUNTABLE TALK for FEEDBACK during PRESENTATIONS | SIGHT WORD | Word wall bingo! | Sight Words
Share this URL with your players:
For more control of your online game, create a clone of this card first.
Learn how to conduct a bingo game.
With players vying for a you'll have to call about __ items before someone wins. There's a __% chance that a lucky player would win after calling __ items.
Tip: If you want your game to last longer (on average), add more unique words/images to it.
