(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Expresses high levels of certainty on matters he couldn't possibly know
Presents statistics in isolation of known causal factors
Incapable of using a search engine instead of begging for a citation
"You wouldn't understand"
Obscurantism
Name-drops philosophers whose works usually don't actually support their point(s)
If opponent expresses his argument in their own words for clarification, cries "strawman!"
No interest in learning from his interlocutor
Hat,tie,or other formal wear in DP
Uses studies they haven't read as evidence
Concludes causal relationships based on grossly insufficient statistical evidence
"Saying I don't understand something is an ad-hominem attack"
Would ask for a citation if you said the sky is blue
Uses circular reasoning to justify their assumptions
Will debate literally anything -physically incapable of not having an opinion on a subject
"That's not what I said", but that is actually what they said.
Fallacy Man!
Wall of text for simple point
Argues against their own points without realizing it
Brings all discussion back to one of a handful of pet issues
/r/IAmVerySmart
Oblivious to second and third order effects
Makes arguments which rely on their specific moral assumptions
