/r/IAmVerySmartName-dropsphilosopherswhose worksusually don'tactually supporttheir point(s)Makesargumentswhich rely ontheir specificmoralassumptionsExpresses highlevels ofcertainty onmatters hecouldn'tpossibly knowWall oftext forsimplepointObscurantismNo interestin learningfrom hisinterlocutorConcludes causalrelationships basedon grosslyinsufficientstatistical evidenceOblivious tosecond andthird ordereffectsBrings alldiscussionback to oneof a handfulof pet issuesPresentsstatistics inisolation ofknown causalfactorsHat,tie,orotherformalwear in DPHas neveradmittedfault intheir lifeWould askfor a citationif you saidthe sky isblueIf opponentexpresses hisargument in theirown words forclarification, cries"strawman!"FallacyMan!Incapable ofusing a searchengine insteadof begging for acitationUses circularreasoning tojustify theirassumptionsArguesagainst theirown pointswithoutrealizing it"Youwouldn'tunderstand"Uses studiesthey haven'tread asevidence"That's notwhat I said",but that isactually whatthey said."Saying I don'tunderstandsomething is anad-hominemattack"Will debate literallyanything -physicallyincapable of nothaving an opinionon a subject/r/IAmVerySmartName-dropsphilosopherswhose worksusually don'tactually supporttheir point(s)Makesargumentswhich rely ontheir specificmoralassumptionsExpresses highlevels ofcertainty onmatters hecouldn'tpossibly knowWall oftext forsimplepointObscurantismNo interestin learningfrom hisinterlocutorConcludes causalrelationships basedon grosslyinsufficientstatistical evidenceOblivious tosecond andthird ordereffectsBrings alldiscussionback to oneof a handfulof pet issuesPresentsstatistics inisolation ofknown causalfactorsHat,tie,orotherformalwear in DPHas neveradmittedfault intheir lifeWould askfor a citationif you saidthe sky isblueIf opponentexpresses hisargument in theirown words forclarification, cries"strawman!"FallacyMan!Incapable ofusing a searchengine insteadof begging for acitationUses circularreasoning tojustify theirassumptionsArguesagainst theirown pointswithoutrealizing it"Youwouldn'tunderstand"Uses studiesthey haven'tread asevidence"That's notwhat I said",but that isactually whatthey said."Saying I don'tunderstandsomething is anad-hominemattack"Will debate literallyanything -physicallyincapable of nothaving an opinionon a subject

Pseudointellectual - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. /r/IAmVerySmart
  2. Name-drops philosophers whose works usually don't actually support their point(s)
  3. Makes arguments which rely on their specific moral assumptions
  4. Expresses high levels of certainty on matters he couldn't possibly know
  5. Wall of text for simple point
  6. Obscurantism
  7. No interest in learning from his interlocutor
  8. Concludes causal relationships based on grossly insufficient statistical evidence
  9. Oblivious to second and third order effects
  10. Brings all discussion back to one of a handful of pet issues
  11. Presents statistics in isolation of known causal factors
  12. Hat,tie,or other formal wear in DP
  13. Has never admitted fault in their life
  14. Would ask for a citation if you said the sky is blue
  15. If opponent expresses his argument in their own words for clarification, cries "strawman!"
  16. Fallacy Man!
  17. Incapable of using a search engine instead of begging for a citation
  18. Uses circular reasoning to justify their assumptions
  19. Argues against their own points without realizing it
  20. "You wouldn't understand"
  21. Uses studies they haven't read as evidence
  22. "That's not what I said", but that is actually what they said.
  23. "Saying I don't understand something is an ad-hominem attack"
  24. Will debate literally anything -physically incapable of not having an opinion on a subject