(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Brings all discussion back to one of a handful of pet issues
/r/IAmVerySmart
Presents statistics in isolation of known causal factors
Makes arguments which rely on their specific moral assumptions
Expresses high levels of certainty on matters he couldn't possibly know
Uses circular reasoning to justify their assumptions
If opponent expresses his argument in their own words for clarification, cries "strawman!"
Obscurantism
Will debate literally anything -physically incapable of not having an opinion on a subject
Fallacy Man!
Incapable of using a search engine instead of begging for a citation
Uses studies they haven't read as evidence
Argues against their own points without realizing it
Has never admitted fault in their life
Hat,tie,or other formal wear in DP
"Saying I don't understand something is an ad-hominem attack"
Oblivious to second and third order effects
"You wouldn't understand"
Wall of text for simple point
Name-drops philosophers whose works usually don't actually support their point(s)
No interest in learning from his interlocutor
"That's not what I said", but that is actually what they said.
Concludes causal relationships based on grossly insufficient statistical evidence
Would ask for a citation if you said the sky is blue