Presentsstatistics inisolation ofknown causalfactorsIncapable ofusing a searchengine insteadof begging for acitationConcludes causalrelationships basedon grosslyinsufficientstatistical evidenceWould askfor a citationif you saidthe sky isblueArguesagainst theirown pointswithoutrealizing itHat,tie,orotherformalwear in DPBrings alldiscussionback to oneof a handfulof pet issuesFallacyMan!Will debate literallyanything -physicallyincapable of nothaving an opinionon a subjectObscurantismUses circularreasoning tojustify theirassumptionsMakesargumentswhich rely ontheir specificmoralassumptions"Saying I don'tunderstandsomething is anad-hominemattack"Oblivious tosecond andthird ordereffectsHas neveradmittedfault intheir lifeIf opponentexpresses hisargument in theirown words forclarification, cries"strawman!""That's notwhat I said",but that isactually whatthey said.Wall oftext forsimplepoint"Youwouldn'tunderstand"Name-dropsphilosopherswhose worksusually don'tactually supporttheir point(s)Expresses highlevels ofcertainty onmatters hecouldn'tpossibly knowNo interestin learningfrom hisinterlocutor/r/IAmVerySmartUses studiesthey haven'tread asevidencePresentsstatistics inisolation ofknown causalfactorsIncapable ofusing a searchengine insteadof begging for acitationConcludes causalrelationships basedon grosslyinsufficientstatistical evidenceWould askfor a citationif you saidthe sky isblueArguesagainst theirown pointswithoutrealizing itHat,tie,orotherformalwear in DPBrings alldiscussionback to oneof a handfulof pet issuesFallacyMan!Will debate literallyanything -physicallyincapable of nothaving an opinionon a subjectObscurantismUses circularreasoning tojustify theirassumptionsMakesargumentswhich rely ontheir specificmoralassumptions"Saying I don'tunderstandsomething is anad-hominemattack"Oblivious tosecond andthird ordereffectsHas neveradmittedfault intheir lifeIf opponentexpresses hisargument in theirown words forclarification, cries"strawman!""That's notwhat I said",but that isactually whatthey said.Wall oftext forsimplepoint"Youwouldn'tunderstand"Name-dropsphilosopherswhose worksusually don'tactually supporttheir point(s)Expresses highlevels ofcertainty onmatters hecouldn'tpossibly knowNo interestin learningfrom hisinterlocutor/r/IAmVerySmartUses studiesthey haven'tread asevidence

Pseudointellectual - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Presents statistics in isolation of known causal factors
  2. Incapable of using a search engine instead of begging for a citation
  3. Concludes causal relationships based on grossly insufficient statistical evidence
  4. Would ask for a citation if you said the sky is blue
  5. Argues against their own points without realizing it
  6. Hat,tie,or other formal wear in DP
  7. Brings all discussion back to one of a handful of pet issues
  8. Fallacy Man!
  9. Will debate literally anything -physically incapable of not having an opinion on a subject
  10. Obscurantism
  11. Uses circular reasoning to justify their assumptions
  12. Makes arguments which rely on their specific moral assumptions
  13. "Saying I don't understand something is an ad-hominem attack"
  14. Oblivious to second and third order effects
  15. Has never admitted fault in their life
  16. If opponent expresses his argument in their own words for clarification, cries "strawman!"
  17. "That's not what I said", but that is actually what they said.
  18. Wall of text for simple point
  19. "You wouldn't understand"
  20. Name-drops philosophers whose works usually don't actually support their point(s)
  21. Expresses high levels of certainty on matters he couldn't possibly know
  22. No interest in learning from his interlocutor
  23. /r/IAmVerySmart
  24. Uses studies they haven't read as evidence