(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Presents statistics in isolation of known causal factors
If opponent expresses his argument in their own words for clarification, cries "strawman!"
Has never admitted fault in their life
Fallacy Man!
Hat,tie,or other formal wear in DP
Name-drops philosophers whose works usually don't actually support their point(s)
Concludes causal relationships based on grossly insufficient statistical evidence
No interest in learning from his interlocutor
"You wouldn't understand"
/r/IAmVerySmart
Will debate literally anything -physically incapable of not having an opinion on a subject
"That's not what I said", but that is actually what they said.
Uses circular reasoning to justify their assumptions
Incapable of using a search engine instead of begging for a citation
Argues against their own points without realizing it
"Saying I don't understand something is an ad-hominem attack"
Brings all discussion back to one of a handful of pet issues
Oblivious to second and third order effects
Obscurantism
Wall of text for simple point
Makes arguments which rely on their specific moral assumptions
Expresses high levels of certainty on matters he couldn't possibly know
Would ask for a citation if you said the sky is blue
