(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Makes arguments which rely on their specific moral assumptions
Expresses high levels of certainty on matters he couldn't possibly know
Wall of text for simple point
Uses circular reasoning to justify their assumptions
/r/IAmVerySmart
Oblivious to second and third order effects
Name-drops philosophers whose works usually don't actually support their point(s)
If opponent expresses his argument in their own words for clarification, cries "strawman!"
Fallacy Man!
Brings all discussion back to one of a handful of pet issues
Argues against their own points without realizing it
Uses studies they haven't read as evidence
"Saying I don't understand something is an ad-hominem attack"
Has never admitted fault in their life
Presents statistics in isolation of known causal factors
Will debate literally anything -physically incapable of not having an opinion on a subject
Obscurantism
"That's not what I said", but that is actually what they said.
No interest in learning from his interlocutor
Would ask for a citation if you said the sky is blue
"You wouldn't understand"
Incapable of using a search engine instead of begging for a citation
Concludes causal relationships based on grossly insufficient statistical evidence
