(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Oblivious to second and third order effects
Brings all discussion back to one of a handful of pet issues
Uses circular reasoning to justify their assumptions
Name-drops philosophers whose works usually don't actually support their point(s)
Has never admitted fault in their life
Concludes causal relationships based on grossly insufficient statistical evidence
"You wouldn't understand"
No interest in learning from his interlocutor
Incapable of using a search engine instead of begging for a citation
Would ask for a citation if you said the sky is blue
Uses studies they haven't read as evidence
If opponent expresses his argument in their own words for clarification, cries "strawman!"
/r/IAmVerySmart
Fallacy Man!
"Saying I don't understand something is an ad-hominem attack"
Makes arguments which rely on their specific moral assumptions
"That's not what I said", but that is actually what they said.
Will debate literally anything -physically incapable of not having an opinion on a subject
Expresses high levels of certainty on matters he couldn't possibly know
Wall of text for simple point
Argues against their own points without realizing it
Obscurantism
Presents statistics in isolation of known causal factors
