This bingo card has a free space and 44 words: Consolidation, Judge Walker, Supreme Court, False. See CPLR 1003, Prejudice, Interpleader-CPLR 1006, Severance, Necessary/ Indispensable Parties, Article 6, Article 10, When the issues are so far apart/unrelated that it would confuse the jury., Occurrence, Standing, True. See CPLR 1003, Real Party in Interest, Bifurcated trial, 8th Judicial District; Commercial Division, CPLR 1001(b), (1) arise out of the same transaction or occurrence; (2) have in common any question of law or fact, Transaction, FRCP 17, Joint trial, When the two actions involve a common question of law or fact, Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Whether Plaintiff has another effective remedy, Prejudice may accrue from nonjoinder to the defendant, Whether & by whom prejudice might have been avoided or in the future may be avoided, Feasibility of a protective provision, Whether an effective judgment may be rendered in the absence of the person not joined, Genuine Controversy, within 20 days after its service, at any time before the time for responding expires, within 20 days after the service of a pleading responding to it, County Court, Where the earliest action was venued, Issue is joined, Discretion, The two issues are wholly distinct, Whether there is a substantial saving that can result, Defendant, Justice requires, False. See CPLR 1002(c), True. See CPLR 1002(b) and Joinder in the alternative.
Claims & Parties Review | Criminal Law Jargon | Competency Bingo | CE.9 - Judicial Branch | Chapter 10
Share this URL with your players:
For more control of your online game, create a clone of this card first.
Learn how to conduct a bingo game.
With players vying for a you'll have to call about __ items before someone wins. There's a __% chance that a lucky player would win after calling __ items.
Tip: If you want your game to last longer (on average), add more unique words/images to it.
