Prejudicemay accruefromnonjoinder tothe defendantJoinder inthealternativeArticle10CountyCourtTransactionSeverance8th JudicialDistrict;CommercialDivisionTrue. SeeCPLR1002(b)Whether & bywhom prejudicemight have beenavoided or in thefuture may beavoidedTrue. SeeCPLR1003JusticerequiresDefendantCPLR1001(b)Interpleader-CPLR 1006Where theearliestaction wasvenuedNecessary/IndispensablePartiesWhether aneffective judgmentmay be renderedin the absence ofthe person notjoinedJointtrial(1) arise out of thesame transactionor occurrence; (2)have in commonany question oflaw or factIssueisjoinedBifurcatedtrialDiscretionPrejudiceArticle6GenuineControversyRealParty inInterestStandingFRCP17Feasibilityof aprotectiveprovisionFalse.SeeCPLR1002(c)SubjectMatterJurisdictionSupremeCourtThe twoissues arewhollydistinctWhen the twoactions involvea commonquestion of lawor factJudgeWalkerWhetherPlaintiff hasanothereffectiveremedyWhetherthere is asubstantialsaving thatcan resultwithin 20 daysafter theservice of apleadingresponding to itConsolidationFalse.SeeCPLR1003at any timebefore thetime forrespondingexpiresOccurrencewithin 20days afterits serviceWhen the issuesare so farapart/unrelatedthat it wouldconfuse the jury.Prejudicemay accruefromnonjoinder tothe defendantJoinder inthealternativeArticle10CountyCourtTransactionSeverance8th JudicialDistrict;CommercialDivisionTrue. SeeCPLR1002(b)Whether & bywhom prejudicemight have beenavoided or in thefuture may beavoidedTrue. SeeCPLR1003JusticerequiresDefendantCPLR1001(b)Interpleader-CPLR 1006Where theearliestaction wasvenuedNecessary/IndispensablePartiesWhether aneffective judgmentmay be renderedin the absence ofthe person notjoinedJointtrial(1) arise out of thesame transactionor occurrence; (2)have in commonany question oflaw or factIssueisjoinedBifurcatedtrialDiscretionPrejudiceArticle6GenuineControversyRealParty inInterestStandingFRCP17Feasibilityof aprotectiveprovisionFalse.SeeCPLR1002(c)SubjectMatterJurisdictionSupremeCourtThe twoissues arewhollydistinctWhen the twoactions involvea commonquestion of lawor factJudgeWalkerWhetherPlaintiff hasanothereffectiveremedyWhetherthere is asubstantialsaving thatcan resultwithin 20 daysafter theservice of apleadingresponding to itConsolidationFalse.SeeCPLR1003at any timebefore thetime forrespondingexpiresOccurrencewithin 20days afterits serviceWhen the issuesare so farapart/unrelatedthat it wouldconfuse the jury.

Claims & Parties Review - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
  1. Prejudice may accrue from nonjoinder to the defendant
  2. Joinder in the alternative
  3. Article 10
  4. County Court
  5. Transaction
  6. Severance
  7. 8th Judicial District; Commercial Division
  8. True. See CPLR 1002(b)
  9. Whether & by whom prejudice might have been avoided or in the future may be avoided
  10. True. See CPLR 1003
  11. Justice requires
  12. Defendant
  13. CPLR 1001(b)
  14. Interpleader-CPLR 1006
  15. Where the earliest action was venued
  16. Necessary/ Indispensable Parties
  17. Whether an effective judgment may be rendered in the absence of the person not joined
  18. Joint trial
  19. (1) arise out of the same transaction or occurrence; (2) have in common any question of law or fact
  20. Issue is joined
  21. Bifurcated trial
  22. Discretion
  23. Prejudice
  24. Article 6
  25. Genuine Controversy
  26. Real Party in Interest
  27. Standing
  28. FRCP 17
  29. Feasibility of a protective provision
  30. False. See CPLR 1002(c)
  31. Subject Matter Jurisdiction
  32. Supreme Court
  33. The two issues are wholly distinct
  34. When the two actions involve a common question of law or fact
  35. Judge Walker
  36. Whether Plaintiff has another effective remedy
  37. Whether there is a substantial saving that can result
  38. within 20 days after the service of a pleading responding to it
  39. Consolidation
  40. False. See CPLR 1003
  41. at any time before the time for responding expires
  42. Occurrence
  43. within 20 days after its service
  44. When the issues are so far apart/unrelated that it would confuse the jury.