This bingo card has a free space and 27 words: "ratings under 4 stars mean death because that's what the users decided to draw the line at", "the number of chapters read is linearly proportional with how well-formed a readers opinion is", "okay, but it'd be trivial to weigh ratings based on at least the first 10 chapter reads", “okay, but once it's implemented, it'd be a foolproof way to prevent drive-by ratings. Users would absolutely not do their best to bypass it", “reminding readers to rate or review would lead to an objectively better rating system", "the rating system behaves differently from a binary rating system mathematically", "we need more five star ratings", "removing ratings completely is beneficial to authors", "removing ratings completely is beneficial to readers", "you can give ideal personalised suggestions without ratings", "you can give ideal personalised suggestions", "it is a bad thing that higher ranked fictions get more views", "having a low average rating means readers dismiss my novel then they go do something else other than reading", "giving readers reading suggestions irrespective of other readers opinions does not result in a worse experience", "it's RR's fault that getting traction as a new author is hard", "ratings affect visibility on all lists", "okay, but RR doesn't actually try to provide lists not based on ratings", "a 0.5 star rating is never justifiable", "there is only bias when talking about 0.5 star ratings", "okay, but there is only bias when talking about ratings less than 3 stars", "negative feedback is inherently bad", "you can evaluate subjective quality/suitability based only on positive feedback", "okay, but you can objectively evaluate it based on the percentage of readers willing to give positive feedback", "okay, but authors would never abuse it to create an unequal situation by using varying levels of aggressive tactics to coerce feedback", "everyone having less negative ratings would improve everyone's rankings", "okay, but having less negative ratings would make it so users give more stories a chance" and "what do you mean readers would just raise the bar? That's absolutely not how it works, that's how why users draw the line at the neutral unbiased mean of 2.75 stars".
Royal Road Review Rationality | Royal Road Review Rationales v2 | Non Profit Bingo | Recognizing Healthy and Unhealthy Coping | UX myths - Bingo!
Share this URL with your players:
For more control of your online game, create a clone of this card first.
Learn how to conduct a bingo game.
With players vying for a you'll have to call about __ items before someone wins. There's a __% chance that a lucky player would win after calling __ items.
Tip: If you want your game to last longer (on average), add more unique words/images to it.
