This bingo card has 60 words: “Reviewer 2 strikes again”, “It worked yesterday”, Coffee is treated as an essential reagent, Someone says “This should be easy” (it was not), A gel looks almost perfect, Code works on one computer only, “Let’s just re-run it”, A figure is remade five minutes before submission, Someone Googles their own error message, “We’ll explain it in the discussion”, A control is added after seeing the results, Someone spills something expensive, You forgot your poster., “It’s probably a batch effect”, An experiment fails for no clear reason, A script runs for hours… then crashes, Someone says “In theory, this should work”, A sample disappears mysteriously, “I swear this worked last week”, A citation spiral begins, A reference from 1973 is crucial, A Nobel laureate is mentioned casually, Someone spends five minutes looking for the right cable/adaptor, “Let’s check the supplementary”, A meeting could definitely have been an email, Someone says “Just one more experiment”, A reviewer asks for a totally new method, “We don’t really know why”, “The data are… moody today”, Someone reuses the same slide from last year, “The sample size is… limited”, A document crashes right before saving, A sentence starts with “In this context…”, A deadline quietly passes, Someone mentions a rejected paper, “This opens many new questions”, A PhD student explains the PI’s own project, A method only one person understands, Someone says “I’ll clean the data later”, A wet lab protocol says “mix gently”, A humanities PhD says “It depends”, Someone mentions ethics approval delays, A figure legend is longer than the figure, Someone says “It’s conceptually simple”, A PhD student wonders why a PhD sounded like a good idea, A freezer alarm goes off, “We’ll fix it in revision”, A theory works beautifully—experiment does not, Someone mentions imposter syndrome (indirectly), A footnote becomes essential, A PI says “Interesting…” (no follow-up), Someone accidentally deletes something important, “Let’s add it to future work”, A lab notebook entry starts with “I think…”, Someone says “This is interdisciplinary”, A paper is cited without being fully read, A title is changed at the last minute, Someone works on it “over the weekend”, A result is called “promising” and “At least it’s reproducible this time”.
Nobel dinner: Academic Bingo | Nobel dinner: Academic Bingo | ENB Team meeting Bingo | Someone who... | Someone who...
Share this URL with your players:
For more control of your online game, create a clone of this card first.
Learn how to conduct a bingo game.
With players vying for a you'll have to call about __ items before someone wins. There's a __% chance that a lucky player would win after calling __ items.
Tip: If you want your game to last longer (on average), add more unique words/images to it.
