Someonementionedagenda-setting(deciding whatproblemsmatter).Someonementionededucation orschooling as anarea ofinfluenceSomeoneexplicitlyused theword powerSomeonecompared theGatesFoundation toan MNC orcorporationSomeonementionedrealism intheirintervention.Juandisaid apaisanismSomeoneargued that theFoundation fillsgaps left bystates.Jero'svoicecrackedSomeone madea normativejudgment(“good,” “bad)rather than ananalytical one.SomeonementionedAfrica as aregion ofimpactSomeoneargued thatmoney equalsinfluence inglobal politicsSomeonequestionedwhether theFoundation’simpact is long-term orsustainable.Someonereferred tosoft power(attraction,ideas, norms)Someonedefended theFoundation byemphasizingefficiency orexpertiseSomeonementioned globalhealth as apolitical (not justhumanitarian)issueSomeone criticizedphilanthrocapitalismor profit-orientedphilanthropy.Someone broughtup inequality(global ordomestic) as aconsequence theFoundation'sactionsSomeonecompared theGatesFoundation toa state actorMapuused herhands toexplainherselfSomeone referredto legitimacy orquestioned whogave theFoundationauthoritySomeone citeda specificprogram orinitiative fundedby the GatesFoundationSomeone usedthe phrase“private actor”or “non-stateactor.”Someonementionedliberalism orinstitutionalcooperation.Someoneargued that theFoundationundermines ordistorts stateprioritiesSomeonementionedagenda-setting(deciding whatproblemsmatter).Someonementionededucation orschooling as anarea ofinfluenceSomeoneexplicitlyused theword powerSomeonecompared theGatesFoundation toan MNC orcorporationSomeonementionedrealism intheirintervention.Juandisaid apaisanismSomeoneargued that theFoundation fillsgaps left bystates.Jero'svoicecrackedSomeone madea normativejudgment(“good,” “bad)rather than ananalytical one.SomeonementionedAfrica as aregion ofimpactSomeoneargued thatmoney equalsinfluence inglobal politicsSomeonequestionedwhether theFoundation’simpact is long-term orsustainable.Someonereferred tosoft power(attraction,ideas, norms)Someonedefended theFoundation byemphasizingefficiency orexpertiseSomeonementioned globalhealth as apolitical (not justhumanitarian)issueSomeone criticizedphilanthrocapitalismor profit-orientedphilanthropy.Someone broughtup inequality(global ordomestic) as aconsequence theFoundation'sactionsSomeonecompared theGatesFoundation toa state actorMapuused herhands toexplainherselfSomeone referredto legitimacy orquestioned whogave theFoundationauthoritySomeone citeda specificprogram orinitiative fundedby the GatesFoundationSomeone usedthe phrase“private actor”or “non-stateactor.”Someonementionedliberalism orinstitutionalcooperation.Someoneargued that theFoundationundermines ordistorts statepriorities

Debate on the impact of the Gates Foundation - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Someone mentioned agenda-setting (deciding what problems matter).
  2. Someone mentioned education or schooling as an area of influence
  3. Someone explicitly used the word power
  4. Someone compared the Gates Foundation to an MNC or corporation
  5. Someone mentioned realism in their intervention.
  6. Juandi said a paisanism
  7. Someone argued that the Foundation fills gaps left by states.
  8. Jero's voice cracked
  9. Someone made a normative judgment (“good,” “bad) rather than an analytical one.
  10. Someone mentioned Africa as a region of impact
  11. Someone argued that money equals influence in global politics
  12. Someone questioned whether the Foundation’s impact is long-term or sustainable.
  13. Someone referred to soft power (attraction, ideas, norms)
  14. Someone defended the Foundation by emphasizing efficiency or expertise
  15. Someone mentioned global health as a political (not just humanitarian) issue
  16. Someone criticized philanthrocapitalism or profit-oriented philanthropy.
  17. Someone brought up inequality (global or domestic) as a consequence the Foundation's actions
  18. Someone compared the Gates Foundation to a state actor
  19. Mapu used her hands to explain herself
  20. Someone referred to legitimacy or questioned who gave the Foundation authority
  21. Someone cited a specific program or initiative funded by the Gates Foundation
  22. Someone used the phrase “private actor” or “non-state actor.”
  23. Someone mentioned liberalism or institutional cooperation.
  24. Someone argued that the Foundation undermines or distorts state priorities