Someoneargued thatmoney equalsinfluence inglobal politicsSomeonecompared theGatesFoundation toa state actorSomeoneargued that theFoundation fillsgaps left bystates.Jero'svoicecrackedSomeonementionedAfrica as aregion ofimpactSomeone usedthe phrase“private actor”or “non-stateactor.”Someoneexplicitlyused theword powerSomeone madea normativejudgment(“good,” “bad)rather than ananalytical one.Someone referredto legitimacy orquestioned whogave theFoundationauthoritySomeonementioned globalhealth as apolitical (not justhumanitarian)issueSomeone citeda specificprogram orinitiative fundedby the GatesFoundationSomeonementionededucation orschooling as anarea ofinfluenceSomeonementionedrealism intheirintervention.Someoneargued that theFoundationundermines ordistorts stateprioritiesMapuused herhands toexplainherselfSomeone criticizedphilanthrocapitalismor profit-orientedphilanthropy.Someonementionedliberalism orinstitutionalcooperation.Someonecompared theGatesFoundation toan MNC orcorporationSomeonementionedagenda-setting(deciding whatproblemsmatter).Someonequestionedwhether theFoundation’simpact is long-term orsustainable.Someonedefended theFoundation byemphasizingefficiency orexpertiseJuandisaid apaisanismSomeone broughtup inequality(global ordomestic) as aconsequence theFoundation'sactionsSomeonereferred tosoft power(attraction,ideas, norms)Someoneargued thatmoney equalsinfluence inglobal politicsSomeonecompared theGatesFoundation toa state actorSomeoneargued that theFoundation fillsgaps left bystates.Jero'svoicecrackedSomeonementionedAfrica as aregion ofimpactSomeone usedthe phrase“private actor”or “non-stateactor.”Someoneexplicitlyused theword powerSomeone madea normativejudgment(“good,” “bad)rather than ananalytical one.Someone referredto legitimacy orquestioned whogave theFoundationauthoritySomeonementioned globalhealth as apolitical (not justhumanitarian)issueSomeone citeda specificprogram orinitiative fundedby the GatesFoundationSomeonementionededucation orschooling as anarea ofinfluenceSomeonementionedrealism intheirintervention.Someoneargued that theFoundationundermines ordistorts stateprioritiesMapuused herhands toexplainherselfSomeone criticizedphilanthrocapitalismor profit-orientedphilanthropy.Someonementionedliberalism orinstitutionalcooperation.Someonecompared theGatesFoundation toan MNC orcorporationSomeonementionedagenda-setting(deciding whatproblemsmatter).Someonequestionedwhether theFoundation’simpact is long-term orsustainable.Someonedefended theFoundation byemphasizingefficiency orexpertiseJuandisaid apaisanismSomeone broughtup inequality(global ordomestic) as aconsequence theFoundation'sactionsSomeonereferred tosoft power(attraction,ideas, norms)

Debate on the impact of the Gates Foundation - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Someone argued that money equals influence in global politics
  2. Someone compared the Gates Foundation to a state actor
  3. Someone argued that the Foundation fills gaps left by states.
  4. Jero's voice cracked
  5. Someone mentioned Africa as a region of impact
  6. Someone used the phrase “private actor” or “non-state actor.”
  7. Someone explicitly used the word power
  8. Someone made a normative judgment (“good,” “bad) rather than an analytical one.
  9. Someone referred to legitimacy or questioned who gave the Foundation authority
  10. Someone mentioned global health as a political (not just humanitarian) issue
  11. Someone cited a specific program or initiative funded by the Gates Foundation
  12. Someone mentioned education or schooling as an area of influence
  13. Someone mentioned realism in their intervention.
  14. Someone argued that the Foundation undermines or distorts state priorities
  15. Mapu used her hands to explain herself
  16. Someone criticized philanthrocapitalism or profit-oriented philanthropy.
  17. Someone mentioned liberalism or institutional cooperation.
  18. Someone compared the Gates Foundation to an MNC or corporation
  19. Someone mentioned agenda-setting (deciding what problems matter).
  20. Someone questioned whether the Foundation’s impact is long-term or sustainable.
  21. Someone defended the Foundation by emphasizing efficiency or expertise
  22. Juandi said a paisanism
  23. Someone brought up inequality (global or domestic) as a consequence the Foundation's actions
  24. Someone referred to soft power (attraction, ideas, norms)