Someonementioned globalhealth as apolitical (not justhumanitarian)issueJero'svoicecrackedSomeone criticizedphilanthrocapitalismor profit-orientedphilanthropy.Someoneexplicitlyused theword powerSomeonementionededucation orschooling as anarea ofinfluenceSomeonequestionedwhether theFoundation’simpact is long-term orsustainable.Someonereferred tosoft power(attraction,ideas, norms)Someone referredto legitimacy orquestioned whogave theFoundationauthoritySomeonementionedAfrica as aregion ofimpactSomeonementionedliberalism orinstitutionalcooperation.Someone usedthe phrase“private actor”or “non-stateactor.”Someonedefended theFoundation byemphasizingefficiency orexpertiseSomeonementionedrealism intheirintervention.Someonementionedagenda-setting(deciding whatproblemsmatter).Mapuused herhands toexplainherselfSomeonecompared theGatesFoundation toan MNC orcorporationSomeoneargued thatmoney equalsinfluence inglobal politicsJuandisaid apaisanismSomeoneargued that theFoundation fillsgaps left bystates.Someone citeda specificprogram orinitiative fundedby the GatesFoundationSomeoneargued that theFoundationundermines ordistorts stateprioritiesSomeonecompared theGatesFoundation toa state actorSomeone madea normativejudgment(“good,” “bad)rather than ananalytical one.Someone broughtup inequality(global ordomestic) as aconsequence theFoundation'sactionsSomeonementioned globalhealth as apolitical (not justhumanitarian)issueJero'svoicecrackedSomeone criticizedphilanthrocapitalismor profit-orientedphilanthropy.Someoneexplicitlyused theword powerSomeonementionededucation orschooling as anarea ofinfluenceSomeonequestionedwhether theFoundation’simpact is long-term orsustainable.Someonereferred tosoft power(attraction,ideas, norms)Someone referredto legitimacy orquestioned whogave theFoundationauthoritySomeonementionedAfrica as aregion ofimpactSomeonementionedliberalism orinstitutionalcooperation.Someone usedthe phrase“private actor”or “non-stateactor.”Someonedefended theFoundation byemphasizingefficiency orexpertiseSomeonementionedrealism intheirintervention.Someonementionedagenda-setting(deciding whatproblemsmatter).Mapuused herhands toexplainherselfSomeonecompared theGatesFoundation toan MNC orcorporationSomeoneargued thatmoney equalsinfluence inglobal politicsJuandisaid apaisanismSomeoneargued that theFoundation fillsgaps left bystates.Someone citeda specificprogram orinitiative fundedby the GatesFoundationSomeoneargued that theFoundationundermines ordistorts stateprioritiesSomeonecompared theGatesFoundation toa state actorSomeone madea normativejudgment(“good,” “bad)rather than ananalytical one.Someone broughtup inequality(global ordomestic) as aconsequence theFoundation'sactions

Debate on the impact of the Gates Foundation - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Someone mentioned global health as a political (not just humanitarian) issue
  2. Jero's voice cracked
  3. Someone criticized philanthrocapitalism or profit-oriented philanthropy.
  4. Someone explicitly used the word power
  5. Someone mentioned education or schooling as an area of influence
  6. Someone questioned whether the Foundation’s impact is long-term or sustainable.
  7. Someone referred to soft power (attraction, ideas, norms)
  8. Someone referred to legitimacy or questioned who gave the Foundation authority
  9. Someone mentioned Africa as a region of impact
  10. Someone mentioned liberalism or institutional cooperation.
  11. Someone used the phrase “private actor” or “non-state actor.”
  12. Someone defended the Foundation by emphasizing efficiency or expertise
  13. Someone mentioned realism in their intervention.
  14. Someone mentioned agenda-setting (deciding what problems matter).
  15. Mapu used her hands to explain herself
  16. Someone compared the Gates Foundation to an MNC or corporation
  17. Someone argued that money equals influence in global politics
  18. Juandi said a paisanism
  19. Someone argued that the Foundation fills gaps left by states.
  20. Someone cited a specific program or initiative funded by the Gates Foundation
  21. Someone argued that the Foundation undermines or distorts state priorities
  22. Someone compared the Gates Foundation to a state actor
  23. Someone made a normative judgment (“good,” “bad) rather than an analytical one.
  24. Someone brought up inequality (global or domestic) as a consequence the Foundation's actions