(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Someone defended the Foundation by emphasizing efficiency or expertise
Someone criticized philanthrocapitalism or profit-oriented philanthropy.
Someone mentioned agenda-setting (deciding what problems matter).
Someone argued that money equals influence in global politics
Someone referred to legitimacy or questioned who gave the Foundation authority
Someone used the phrase “private actor” or “non-state actor.”
Someone compared the Gates Foundation to a state actor
Someone brought up inequality (global or domestic) as a consequence the Foundation's actions
Someone compared the Gates Foundation to an MNC or corporation
Someone cited a specific program or initiative funded by the Gates Foundation
Someone explicitly used the word power
Someone referred to soft power (attraction, ideas, norms)
Someone questioned whether the Foundation’s impact is long-term or sustainable.
Someone mentioned education or schooling as an area of influence
Mapu
used her hands to explain herself
Someone made a normative judgment (“good,” “bad) rather than an analytical one.
Someone mentioned liberalism or institutional cooperation.
Someone argued that the Foundation fills gaps left by states.
Someone mentioned global health as a political (not just humanitarian) issue
Someone argued that the Foundation undermines or distorts state priorities
