Someonecompared theGatesFoundation toan MNC orcorporationSomeone citeda specificprogram orinitiative fundedby the GatesFoundationJero'svoicecrackedJuandisaid apaisanismMapuused herhands toexplainherselfSomeone criticizedphilanthrocapitalismor profit-orientedphilanthropy.Someonedefended theFoundation byemphasizingefficiency orexpertiseSomeone usedthe phrase“private actor”or “non-stateactor.”Someoneargued that theFoundation fillsgaps left bystates.SomeonementionedAfrica as aregion ofimpactSomeonementioned globalhealth as apolitical (not justhumanitarian)issueSomeone broughtup inequality(global ordomestic) as aconsequence theFoundation'sactionsSomeoneargued thatmoney equalsinfluence inglobal politicsSomeonementionededucation orschooling as anarea ofinfluenceSomeone madea normativejudgment(“good,” “bad)rather than ananalytical one.Someonereferred tosoft power(attraction,ideas, norms)Someonequestionedwhether theFoundation’simpact is long-term orsustainable.Someonementionedrealism intheirintervention.Someonecompared theGatesFoundation toa state actorSomeoneexplicitlyused theword powerSomeone referredto legitimacy orquestioned whogave theFoundationauthoritySomeoneargued that theFoundationundermines ordistorts stateprioritiesSomeonementionedagenda-setting(deciding whatproblemsmatter).Someonementionedliberalism orinstitutionalcooperation.Someonecompared theGatesFoundation toan MNC orcorporationSomeone citeda specificprogram orinitiative fundedby the GatesFoundationJero'svoicecrackedJuandisaid apaisanismMapuused herhands toexplainherselfSomeone criticizedphilanthrocapitalismor profit-orientedphilanthropy.Someonedefended theFoundation byemphasizingefficiency orexpertiseSomeone usedthe phrase“private actor”or “non-stateactor.”Someoneargued that theFoundation fillsgaps left bystates.SomeonementionedAfrica as aregion ofimpactSomeonementioned globalhealth as apolitical (not justhumanitarian)issueSomeone broughtup inequality(global ordomestic) as aconsequence theFoundation'sactionsSomeoneargued thatmoney equalsinfluence inglobal politicsSomeonementionededucation orschooling as anarea ofinfluenceSomeone madea normativejudgment(“good,” “bad)rather than ananalytical one.Someonereferred tosoft power(attraction,ideas, norms)Someonequestionedwhether theFoundation’simpact is long-term orsustainable.Someonementionedrealism intheirintervention.Someonecompared theGatesFoundation toa state actorSomeoneexplicitlyused theword powerSomeone referredto legitimacy orquestioned whogave theFoundationauthoritySomeoneargued that theFoundationundermines ordistorts stateprioritiesSomeonementionedagenda-setting(deciding whatproblemsmatter).Someonementionedliberalism orinstitutionalcooperation.

Debate on the impact of the Gates Foundation - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Someone compared the Gates Foundation to an MNC or corporation
  2. Someone cited a specific program or initiative funded by the Gates Foundation
  3. Jero's voice cracked
  4. Juandi said a paisanism
  5. Mapu used her hands to explain herself
  6. Someone criticized philanthrocapitalism or profit-oriented philanthropy.
  7. Someone defended the Foundation by emphasizing efficiency or expertise
  8. Someone used the phrase “private actor” or “non-state actor.”
  9. Someone argued that the Foundation fills gaps left by states.
  10. Someone mentioned Africa as a region of impact
  11. Someone mentioned global health as a political (not just humanitarian) issue
  12. Someone brought up inequality (global or domestic) as a consequence the Foundation's actions
  13. Someone argued that money equals influence in global politics
  14. Someone mentioned education or schooling as an area of influence
  15. Someone made a normative judgment (“good,” “bad) rather than an analytical one.
  16. Someone referred to soft power (attraction, ideas, norms)
  17. Someone questioned whether the Foundation’s impact is long-term or sustainable.
  18. Someone mentioned realism in their intervention.
  19. Someone compared the Gates Foundation to a state actor
  20. Someone explicitly used the word power
  21. Someone referred to legitimacy or questioned who gave the Foundation authority
  22. Someone argued that the Foundation undermines or distorts state priorities
  23. Someone mentioned agenda-setting (deciding what problems matter).
  24. Someone mentioned liberalism or institutional cooperation.