Someonestarts writingafterdecision ismadeMultiplepeopletalk atonce“Can yourepeatthat?”Meetinghas morethan 8people“We’re all onthe samepage” (butcheckinganyway)One sectiontakes uphalf themeetingGoalwording getsdebated for5+ minutes“We justwant what’sbest for thestudent”Agenda isreferencedbut notfollowedexactly“Accordingto data…”(followed byinterpretationdebate)LEAleaves themeetingLast-minuteclarificationadded atthe endThere are nomore copiesof theproceduralsafeguardsParentbrings copyof draft IEPwith themParentconcern leadsto longerdiscussionsegmentSideconversationstarts mid-discussionServiceminutesdiscussedin detailParentdoes notattend themeeting“Let’s putthat inwriting”Everyonelooks ateach othersilentlyA silence whereeveryone ismentallyorganizingnotesConferenceroom is toohot or toocold“What doesthat look likein theclassroom?”SomeoneparticipatesvirtuallyMeeting runsinto nextscheduledmeetingIntroductionstake longerthanexpectedOutsideproviderattends andcontributesnothing“Just onemorething…”(turns into 10things)A supportis addedoradjustedMeeting isinterruptedby a phonecall oremergency“We’veseenprogress,but…”The generaleducationteacher doesnot talkTimelinediscussionappearsunexpectedly“In myexperience…”Bothparentsattend themeetingFinaldecisionrevisitedbeforeclosing“We’llcircleback tothat”Data isreferencedbut notshown“We’ll justgo in order”(then don’t)You show upto the wrongmeetinglocationYou bring thewrongstudent fileto themeeting“Let’srevisitthat later”“Let meplay devil’sadvocate…”Someonesays “I don’twant to derailthe meeting,but…”AcronymusedwithoutexplanationMeetingcannot starton time dueto latemember“Leastrestrictiveenvironment”mentionedA concern in askill area isbrought up thathas nevertalked aboutbeforeYou spillcoffee onyour IEPcopiesMeetingends withaction stepsscramblePlacementdiscussionbecomesverynuancedSomeone asksaboutimplementationlogisticsSomeonesays “tobehonest…”Pens startmoving whenimportantdecisionshappen“Quickquestion”(notquick)Someoneproposes aservicewithout datato supportProgressmonitoringmethods arequestionedClarification ofaccommodationsrequestedSomeonestarts writingafterdecision ismadeMultiplepeopletalk atonce“Can yourepeatthat?”Meetinghas morethan 8people“We’re all onthe samepage” (butcheckinganyway)One sectiontakes uphalf themeetingGoalwording getsdebated for5+ minutes“We justwant what’sbest for thestudent”Agenda isreferencedbut notfollowedexactly“Accordingto data…”(followed byinterpretationdebate)LEAleaves themeetingLast-minuteclarificationadded atthe endThere are nomore copiesof theproceduralsafeguardsParentbrings copyof draft IEPwith themParentconcern leadsto longerdiscussionsegmentSideconversationstarts mid-discussionServiceminutesdiscussedin detailParentdoes notattend themeeting“Let’s putthat inwriting”Everyonelooks ateach othersilentlyA silence whereeveryone ismentallyorganizingnotesConferenceroom is toohot or toocold“What doesthat look likein theclassroom?”SomeoneparticipatesvirtuallyMeeting runsinto nextscheduledmeetingIntroductionstake longerthanexpectedOutsideproviderattends andcontributesnothing“Just onemorething…”(turns into 10things)A supportis addedoradjustedMeeting isinterruptedby a phonecall oremergency“We’veseenprogress,but…”The generaleducationteacher doesnot talkTimelinediscussionappearsunexpectedly“In myexperience…”Bothparentsattend themeetingFinaldecisionrevisitedbeforeclosing“We’llcircleback tothat”Data isreferencedbut notshown“We’ll justgo in order”(then don’t)You show upto the wrongmeetinglocationYou bring thewrongstudent fileto themeeting“Let’srevisitthat later”“Let meplay devil’sadvocate…”Someonesays “I don’twant to derailthe meeting,but…”AcronymusedwithoutexplanationMeetingcannot starton time dueto latemember“Leastrestrictiveenvironment”mentionedA concern in askill area isbrought up thathas nevertalked aboutbeforeYou spillcoffee onyour IEPcopiesMeetingends withaction stepsscramblePlacementdiscussionbecomesverynuancedSomeone asksaboutimplementationlogisticsSomeonesays “tobehonest…”Pens startmoving whenimportantdecisionshappen“Quickquestion”(notquick)Someoneproposes aservicewithout datato supportProgressmonitoringmethods arequestionedClarification ofaccommodationsrequested

IEP Meeting - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
  1. Someone starts writing after decision is made
  2. Multiple people talk at once
  3. “Can you repeat that?”
  4. Meeting has more than 8 people
  5. “We’re all on the same page” (but checking anyway)
  6. One section takes up half the meeting
  7. Goal wording gets debated for 5+ minutes
  8. “We just want what’s best for the student”
  9. Agenda is referenced but not followed exactly
  10. “According to data…” (followed by interpretation debate)
  11. LEA leaves the meeting
  12. Last-minute clarification added at the end
  13. There are no more copies of the procedural safeguards
  14. Parent brings copy of draft IEP with them
  15. Parent concern leads to longer discussion segment
  16. Side conversation starts mid-discussion
  17. Service minutes discussed in detail
  18. Parent does not attend the meeting
  19. “Let’s put that in writing”
  20. Everyone looks at each other silently
  21. A silence where everyone is mentally organizing notes
  22. Conference room is too hot or too cold
  23. “What does that look like in the classroom?”
  24. Someone participates virtually
  25. Meeting runs into next scheduled meeting
  26. Introductions take longer than expected
  27. Outside provider attends and contributes nothing
  28. “Just one more thing…” (turns into 10 things)
  29. A support is added or adjusted
  30. Meeting is interrupted by a phone call or emergency
  31. “We’ve seen progress, but…”
  32. The general education teacher does not talk
  33. Timeline discussion appears unexpectedly
  34. “In my experience…”
  35. Both parents attend the meeting
  36. Final decision revisited before closing
  37. “We’ll circle back to that”
  38. Data is referenced but not shown
  39. “We’ll just go in order” (then don’t)
  40. You show up to the wrong meeting location
  41. You bring the wrong student file to the meeting
  42. “Let’s revisit that later”
  43. “Let me play devil’s advocate…”
  44. Someone says “I don’t want to derail the meeting, but…”
  45. Acronym used without explanation
  46. Meeting cannot start on time due to late member
  47. “Least restrictive environment” mentioned
  48. A concern in a skill area is brought up that has never talked about before
  49. You spill coffee on your IEP copies
  50. Meeting ends with action steps scramble
  51. Placement discussion becomes very nuanced
  52. Someone asks about implementation logistics
  53. Someone says “to be honest…”
  54. Pens start moving when important decisions happen
  55. “Quick question” (not quick)
  56. Someone proposes a service without data to support
  57. Progress monitoring methods are questioned
  58. Clarification of accommodations requested