(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
Direct payments for ecosystem services
identify keystone species
leaders effectively manage value conflicts
challenge conventional wisdom in environmental management
search for solutions that multi-solve (address several problems at once)
leaders encouraged participants to question assumptions and positions
leaders show flexibility and adaptive decision-making
use of incentive-based feedback
create buffers around sensitive areas
manage from a watershed scale
Use learning networks or communities of practice
monitor slow variables that underlie key thresholds
government programs share the monitoring of resources
connect habitats to ensure species and genetic diversity
use watershed management approach
acknowledge power dynamics
use of regulation-based feedback
map units flowing across links (information, animals, energy, resources)
collaborative approach to problem-solving
consider participant motivation (perceptions of personal benefit, success, or power)
use of causal loop diagrams
keep track of actions that obscure or disrupt stabilizing feedbacks
pay attention to ecosystem services with low redundancy (such as those controlled by keystone species/actors)
monitor species richness
payment to local people for monitoring ecosystem services
map connectivity of social-ecological systems
facilitation to share different knowledge, beliefs, and worldviews
manage current connectivity patterns to contain the risk of a systemic failure
build green infrastructure
try experiments or design prototype solutions to see what was effective
leaders encouraged participants to withstand short-term failure
Build social networks to increase trust
Use of psychology to change mental models
iterative evaluation of identifying stakeholders (who should be here that isn’t?)
Stakeholders engage in prolonged and frequent interaction
use collaborative knowledge building, involving managers, scientists, and resource-users
consider both formal and informal power structures
challenge conventional wisdom in health
purchase land or enact land trusts
Broad and diverse participation represents a range of different sources of knowledge
acknowledge diverse knowledge traditions
accommodate different levels of literacy
use of agroforestry or organic farming methods
If something didn't work, they learned from the experiment and kept trying
identify highly connected nodes or isolated patches in the social-ecological system
support long-term ecological monitoring
consider multiple subjective realities or lived experiences
strengthen feedbacks that help maintain a desired social-ecological system
reduce fertilizers and pesticides
protect native pollinators
use of labeling to connect production system and individual consumers
clarify goals and expectations of the group through a participatory process
use of dashboards that account for ecological and social thresholds
provide incentives for livelihood diversity
provide opportunities for extended stakeholder engagement
apply appropriate disturbance regimes
mention of thresholds, tipping points, or the potential for sudden, abrupt change
found a new way of thinking that came from outside the system (expanded worldview)
use of system-based frameworks
explicit allotment of financial resources allowing time for learning or failure
address missing feedbacks (especially in relation to key drivers of change)
leaders draw out reticent participants
Provide adequate funding for long-term social interaction
challenge gender norms
consider consequences of actions across long time horizons
consider consequences of actions across a range of geographic space
maintain or create structural complexity in the landscape
government programs share decision-making with nonprofits or community groups
develop an uncertainty-tolerant culture
control overabundant invasive species
use visualization and network analysis tools to map the structure of connectivity
map connectivity of ecosystem services
management of power differentials among stakeholders
Use of inclusive project design to allow for multiple stakeholders
use broad indicators of well-being beyond jobs or income
maintain landscape heterogeneity
experiment with different ways to increase engagement
use of scenario planning
manage natural systems with the intent of maintaining diversity or complexity
assess unintended consequences of decisions
use small scale water system innovations like rainwater harvesting
invest in understanding of key variables and feedbacks of the system
reward participation through direct payment or cost recovery
identify key actors, institutions, or organizations
identify alternative development pathways
restore habitat connectivity to maintain ecosystem functioning
weaken or break feedbacks that trap social-ecological services in undesired regimes
identify important system elements/ interactions
consider where non-linear change might occur
change the focus of management paradigms from efficiency to resilience
establish governance structure to respond to changes in slow variables
use small scale water system innovations like conservation tillage
