(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
acknowledge power dynamics
use watershed management approach
strengthen feedbacks that help maintain a desired social-ecological system
use small scale water system innovations like conservation tillage
iterative evaluation of identifying stakeholders (who should be here that isn’t?)
use of incentive-based feedback
Broad and diverse participation represents a range of different sources of knowledge
use of causal loop diagrams
leaders show flexibility and adaptive decision-making
payment to local people for monitoring ecosystem services
leaders draw out reticent participants
map units flowing across links (information, animals, energy, resources)
protect native pollinators
provide incentives for livelihood diversity
connect habitats to ensure species and genetic diversity
consider where non-linear change might occur
monitor slow variables that underlie key thresholds
consider consequences of actions across long time horizons
control overabundant invasive species
experiment with different ways to increase engagement
use of system-based frameworks
leaders effectively manage value conflicts
weaken or break feedbacks that trap social-ecological services in undesired regimes
Build social networks to increase trust
assess unintended consequences of decisions
consider multiple subjective realities or lived experiences
create refuge areas for species
mention of thresholds, tipping points, or the potential for sudden, abrupt change
apply appropriate disturbance regimes
Provide adequate funding for long-term social interaction
use small scale water system innovations like rainwater harvesting
use visualization and network analysis tools to map the structure of connectivity
create buffers around sensitive areas
invest in understanding of key variables and feedbacks of the system
change the focus of management paradigms from efficiency to resilience
try experiments or design prototype solutions to see what was effective
Use of inclusive project design to allow for multiple stakeholders
use of scenario planning
manage natural systems with the intent of maintaining diversity or complexity
acknowledge diverse knowledge traditions
challenge conventional wisdom in health
government programs share decision-making with nonprofits or community groups
manage current connectivity patterns to contain the risk of a systemic failure
identify keystone species
develop an uncertainty-tolerant culture
consider consequences of actions across a range of geographic space
leaders encouraged participants to withstand short-term failure
provide opportunities for extended stakeholder engagement
map connectivity of social-ecological systems
use of agroforestry or organic farming methods
build green infrastructure
government programs share the monitoring of resources
Stakeholders engage in prolonged and frequent interaction
establish governance structure to respond to changes in slow variables
If something didn't work, they learned from the experiment and kept trying
found a new way of thinking that came from outside the system (expanded worldview)
consider both formal and informal power structures
identify alternative development pathways
address missing feedbacks (especially in relation to key drivers of change)
manage from a watershed scale
collaborative approach to problem-solving
use broad indicators of well-being beyond jobs or income
reduce fertilizers and pesticides
monitor species richness
Use of psychology to change mental models
purchase land or enact land trusts
keep track of actions that obscure or disrupt stabilizing feedbacks
use of dashboards that account for ecological and social thresholds
accommodate different levels of literacy
challenge conventional wisdom in environmental management
Use learning networks or communities of practice
restore habitat connectivity to maintain ecosystem functioning
clarify goals and expectations of the group through a participatory process
Direct payments for ecosystem services
consider participant motivation (perceptions of personal benefit, success, or power)
management of power differentials among stakeholders
challenge conventional wisdom in economics
identify important system elements/ interactions
leaders encouraged participants to question assumptions and positions
identify key actors, institutions, or organizations
use of labeling to connect production system and individual consumers
maintain or create structural complexity in the landscape
facilitation to share different knowledge, beliefs, and worldviews
maintain landscape heterogeneity
pay attention to ecosystem services with low redundancy (such as those controlled by keystone species/actors)
search for solutions that multi-solve (address several problems at once)
identify highly connected nodes or isolated patches in the social-ecological system
support long-term ecological monitoring
map connectivity of ecosystem services
challenge gender norms
use collaborative knowledge building, involving managers, scientists, and resource-users
use of regulation-based feedback
reward participation through direct payment or cost recovery
explicit allotment of financial resources allowing time for learning or failure
