(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
government programs share decision-making with nonprofits or community groups
use of regulation-based feedback
use of dashboards that account for ecological and social thresholds
apply appropriate disturbance regimes
use of scenario planning
mention of thresholds, tipping points, or the potential for sudden, abrupt change
management of power differentials among stakeholders
provide incentives for livelihood diversity
use of causal loop diagrams
acknowledge diverse knowledge traditions
protect native pollinators
manage natural systems with the intent of maintaining diversity or complexity
map units flowing across links (information, animals, energy, resources)
reward participation through direct payment or cost recovery
consider where non-linear change might occur
consider multiple subjective realities or lived experiences
Provide adequate funding for long-term social interaction
strengthen feedbacks that help maintain a desired social-ecological system
clarify goals and expectations of the group through a participatory process
create buffers around sensitive areas
manage current connectivity patterns to contain the risk of a systemic failure
Use of psychology to change mental models
purchase land or enact land trusts
invest in understanding of key variables and feedbacks of the system
manage from a watershed scale
Use of inclusive project design to allow for multiple stakeholders
Direct payments for ecosystem services
weaken or break feedbacks that trap social-ecological services in undesired regimes
pay attention to ecosystem services with low redundancy (such as those controlled by keystone species/actors)
consider participant motivation (perceptions of personal benefit, success, or power)
monitor species richness
use broad indicators of well-being beyond jobs or income
restore habitat connectivity to maintain ecosystem functioning
identify keystone species
found a new way of thinking that came from outside the system (expanded worldview)
payment to local people for monitoring ecosystem services
consider consequences of actions across long time horizons
use of agroforestry or organic farming methods
government programs share the monitoring of resources
identify important system elements/ interactions
acknowledge power dynamics
support long-term ecological monitoring
identify key actors, institutions, or organizations
experiment with different ways to increase engagement
explicit allotment of financial resources allowing time for learning or failure
map connectivity of social-ecological systems
consider consequences of actions across a range of geographic space
develop an uncertainty-tolerant culture
monitor slow variables that underlie key thresholds
use of labeling to connect production system and individual consumers
identify highly connected nodes or isolated patches in the social-ecological system
search for solutions that multi-solve (address several problems at once)
try experiments or design prototype solutions to see what was effective
change the focus of management paradigms from efficiency to resilience
control overabundant invasive species
leaders encouraged participants to question assumptions and positions
maintain or create structural complexity in the landscape
consider both formal and informal power structures
If something didn't work, they learned from the experiment and kept trying
use of incentive-based feedback
leaders encouraged participants to withstand short-term failure
iterative evaluation of identifying stakeholders (who should be here that isn’t?)
keep track of actions that obscure or disrupt stabilizing feedbacks
use watershed management approach
address missing feedbacks (especially in relation to key drivers of change)
accommodate different levels of literacy
Use learning networks or communities of practice
collaborative approach to problem-solving
challenge conventional wisdom in economics
use visualization and network analysis tools to map the structure of connectivity
challenge conventional wisdom in environmental management
use of system-based frameworks
Stakeholders engage in prolonged and frequent interaction
reduce fertilizers and pesticides
build green infrastructure
leaders draw out reticent participants
challenge gender norms
use small scale water system innovations like rainwater harvesting
leaders effectively manage value conflicts
Build social networks to increase trust
facilitation to share different knowledge, beliefs, and worldviews
use collaborative knowledge building, involving managers, scientists, and resource-users
challenge conventional wisdom in health
provide opportunities for extended stakeholder engagement
map connectivity of ecosystem services
Broad and diverse participation represents a range of different sources of knowledge
leaders show flexibility and adaptive decision-making
use small scale water system innovations like conservation tillage
identify alternative development pathways
create refuge areas for species
maintain landscape heterogeneity
establish governance structure to respond to changes in slow variables
assess unintended consequences of decisions
connect habitats to ensure species and genetic diversity
