(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
use of dashboards that account for ecological and social thresholds
leaders effectively manage value conflicts
pay attention to ecosystem services with low redundancy (such as those controlled by keystone species/actors)
identify keystone species
control overabundant invasive species
restore habitat connectivity to maintain ecosystem functioning
clarify goals and expectations of the group through a participatory process
assess unintended consequences of decisions
challenge conventional wisdom in economics
develop an uncertainty-tolerant culture
government programs share the monitoring of resources
address missing feedbacks (especially in relation to key drivers of change)
apply appropriate disturbance regimes
mention of thresholds, tipping points, or the potential for sudden, abrupt change
found a new way of thinking that came from outside the system (expanded worldview)
experiment with different ways to increase engagement
consider participant motivation (perceptions of personal benefit, success, or power)
reduce fertilizers and pesticides
collaborative approach to problem-solving
manage current connectivity patterns to contain the risk of a systemic failure
weaken or break feedbacks that trap social-ecological services in undesired regimes
Provide adequate funding for long-term social interaction
support long-term ecological monitoring
purchase land or enact land trusts
iterative evaluation of identifying stakeholders (who should be here that isn’t?)
strengthen feedbacks that help maintain a desired social-ecological system
acknowledge power dynamics
reward participation through direct payment or cost recovery
use collaborative knowledge building, involving managers, scientists, and resource-users
challenge conventional wisdom in environmental management
leaders show flexibility and adaptive decision-making
Stakeholders engage in prolonged and frequent interaction
provide opportunities for extended stakeholder engagement
protect native pollinators
identify important system elements/ interactions
invest in understanding of key variables and feedbacks of the system
map connectivity of ecosystem services
government programs share decision-making with nonprofits or community groups
manage from a watershed scale
use of causal loop diagrams
maintain or create structural complexity in the landscape
monitor slow variables that underlie key thresholds
use of agroforestry or organic farming methods
consider multiple subjective realities or lived experiences
use of system-based frameworks
Direct payments for ecosystem services
leaders encouraged participants to withstand short-term failure
manage natural systems with the intent of maintaining diversity or complexity
facilitation to share different knowledge, beliefs, and worldviews
use of incentive-based feedback
Build social networks to increase trust
identify alternative development pathways
use watershed management approach
try experiments or design prototype solutions to see what was effective
build green infrastructure
challenge conventional wisdom in health
create refuge areas for species
Use of psychology to change mental models
change the focus of management paradigms from efficiency to resilience
accommodate different levels of literacy
consider consequences of actions across long time horizons
search for solutions that multi-solve (address several problems at once)
challenge gender norms
use broad indicators of well-being beyond jobs or income
monitor species richness
provide incentives for livelihood diversity
consider where non-linear change might occur
payment to local people for monitoring ecosystem services
map connectivity of social-ecological systems
Use of inclusive project design to allow for multiple stakeholders
If something didn't work, they learned from the experiment and kept trying
consider consequences of actions across a range of geographic space
establish governance structure to respond to changes in slow variables
management of power differentials among stakeholders
explicit allotment of financial resources allowing time for learning or failure
use of scenario planning
leaders draw out reticent participants
consider both formal and informal power structures
use small scale water system innovations like conservation tillage
leaders encouraged participants to question assumptions and positions
use visualization and network analysis tools to map the structure of connectivity
use of regulation-based feedback
Use learning networks or communities of practice
connect habitats to ensure species and genetic diversity
acknowledge diverse knowledge traditions
maintain landscape heterogeneity
map units flowing across links (information, animals, energy, resources)
identify highly connected nodes or isolated patches in the social-ecological system
identify key actors, institutions, or organizations
Broad and diverse participation represents a range of different sources of knowledge
keep track of actions that obscure or disrupt stabilizing feedbacks
create buffers around sensitive areas
use of labeling to connect production system and individual consumers
use small scale water system innovations like rainwater harvesting
