"Infrastructure""SocialSecurity""SecondAmendment""Veterans""Inflation"False dilemma(presentingonly twooptions whenmore exist)Moderatorhaving tostep in"SupremeCourt"MentionofUkraineLoadedquestion(asking aquestion thatcontains apresupposition)Appeal toauthority (usingthe opinion ofan authorityfigure asevidence)"Education"Use ofprops(charts,photos, etc.)"Jobs""Tradedeals""Electionfraud"Non sequitur (aconclusion thatdoesn't logicallyfollow from thepremises)"Cleanenergy""ClimateChange""Healthcare""Votingrights"Crowdreactions(cheering,booing, etc.)Candidatesmaking jokesor sarcasticremarksPersonalattacks orname-calling"Obamacare""Immigrationreform"Appeal toemotion (usingemotions ratherthan facts topersuade)"Affordablehousing""Bipartisanship""Medicare"Red herring(distractingfrom the mainissue with anirrelevant point)Candidatesusingrehearsedone-liners orcatchphrases"Foreignpolicy"Appeal to tradition(arguing thatsomething shouldcontinue becauseit has traditionallybeen done thatway)"Unemploymentrate""Infrastructurebill"Post hoc ergopropter hoc(assuming thatbecause one eventfollowed another, itwas caused by thefirst)"LGBTQ+rights"Candidatesrepeating thesame pointmultipletimes"Policereform""Gasprices""Mentalhealth""Abortion"Hastygeneralization(drawing aconclusion basedon insufficientevidence)Ad hominem(attacking theopponentinstead of theirargument)Awkwardpauses"Racialjustice""MakeAmericaGreatAgain"Slippery slope(arguing thatone action willlead to a seriesof negativeevents)Referenceto theborderwall"Guncontrol""Cybersecurity""FakeNews"Strawman(misrepresentingthe opponent'sargument tomake it easier toattack)Candidatesgoing overtheirallotted time"China""Nationalsecurity""Economy"Mentionof HunterBiden"Women’srights"Moderatormuting acandidate'smicrophone"SleepyJoe"Candidatestalking overeach other"COVID-19pandemic"TechnicaldifficultiesCircularreasoning (theargument'sconclusion isused as apremise)"BuildBackBetter""Lawandorder""Minimumwage""GreenNewDeal""Russia"Interruptionsby onecandidate"Taxreturns"Begging thequestion(assuming thetruth of what oneis supposed toprove)Bandwagon(arguing thatsomething istrue becauseit is popular)"Middleclass""Studentloans"Yellingorshouting"Afghanistan"Candidatesavoidingansweringthe questiondirectly"Infrastructure""SocialSecurity""SecondAmendment""Veterans""Inflation"False dilemma(presentingonly twooptions whenmore exist)Moderatorhaving tostep in"SupremeCourt"MentionofUkraineLoadedquestion(asking aquestion thatcontains apresupposition)Appeal toauthority (usingthe opinion ofan authorityfigure asevidence)"Education"Use ofprops(charts,photos, etc.)"Jobs""Tradedeals""Electionfraud"Non sequitur (aconclusion thatdoesn't logicallyfollow from thepremises)"Cleanenergy""ClimateChange""Healthcare""Votingrights"Crowdreactions(cheering,booing, etc.)Candidatesmaking jokesor sarcasticremarksPersonalattacks orname-calling"Obamacare""Immigrationreform"Appeal toemotion (usingemotions ratherthan facts topersuade)"Affordablehousing""Bipartisanship""Medicare"Red herring(distractingfrom the mainissue with anirrelevant point)Candidatesusingrehearsedone-liners orcatchphrases"Foreignpolicy"Appeal to tradition(arguing thatsomething shouldcontinue becauseit has traditionallybeen done thatway)"Unemploymentrate""Infrastructurebill"Post hoc ergopropter hoc(assuming thatbecause one eventfollowed another, itwas caused by thefirst)"LGBTQ+rights"Candidatesrepeating thesame pointmultipletimes"Policereform""Gasprices""Mentalhealth""Abortion"Hastygeneralization(drawing aconclusion basedon insufficientevidence)Ad hominem(attacking theopponentinstead of theirargument)Awkwardpauses"Racialjustice""MakeAmericaGreatAgain"Slippery slope(arguing thatone action willlead to a seriesof negativeevents)Referenceto theborderwall"Guncontrol""Cybersecurity""FakeNews"Strawman(misrepresentingthe opponent'sargument tomake it easier toattack)Candidatesgoing overtheirallotted time"China""Nationalsecurity""Economy"Mentionof HunterBiden"Women’srights"Moderatormuting acandidate'smicrophone"SleepyJoe"Candidatestalking overeach other"COVID-19pandemic"TechnicaldifficultiesCircularreasoning (theargument'sconclusion isused as apremise)"BuildBackBetter""Lawandorder""Minimumwage""GreenNewDeal""Russia"Interruptionsby onecandidate"Taxreturns"Begging thequestion(assuming thetruth of what oneis supposed toprove)Bandwagon(arguing thatsomething istrue becauseit is popular)"Middleclass""Studentloans"Yellingorshouting"Afghanistan"Candidatesavoidingansweringthe questiondirectly

Presidential Debate Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
  1. "Infrastructure"
  2. "Social Security"
  3. "Second Amendment"
  4. "Veterans"
  5. "Inflation"
  6. False dilemma (presenting only two options when more exist)
  7. Moderator having to step in
  8. "Supreme Court"
  9. Mention of Ukraine
  10. Loaded question (asking a question that contains a presupposition)
  11. Appeal to authority (using the opinion of an authority figure as evidence)
  12. "Education"
  13. Use of props (charts, photos, etc.)
  14. "Jobs"
  15. "Trade deals"
  16. "Election fraud"
  17. Non sequitur (a conclusion that doesn't logically follow from the premises)
  18. "Clean energy"
  19. "Climate Change"
  20. "Healthcare"
  21. "Voting rights"
  22. Crowd reactions (cheering, booing, etc.)
  23. Candidates making jokes or sarcastic remarks
  24. Personal attacks or name-calling
  25. "Obamacare"
  26. "Immigration reform"
  27. Appeal to emotion (using emotions rather than facts to persuade)
  28. "Affordable housing"
  29. "Bipartisanship"
  30. "Medicare"
  31. Red herring (distracting from the main issue with an irrelevant point)
  32. Candidates using rehearsed one-liners or catchphrases
  33. "Foreign policy"
  34. Appeal to tradition (arguing that something should continue because it has traditionally been done that way)
  35. "Unemployment rate"
  36. "Infrastructure bill"
  37. Post hoc ergo propter hoc (assuming that because one event followed another, it was caused by the first)
  38. "LGBTQ+ rights"
  39. Candidates repeating the same point multiple times
  40. "Police reform"
  41. "Gas prices"
  42. "Mental health"
  43. "Abortion"
  44. Hasty generalization (drawing a conclusion based on insufficient evidence)
  45. Ad hominem (attacking the opponent instead of their argument)
  46. Awkward pauses
  47. "Racial justice"
  48. "Make America Great Again"
  49. Slippery slope (arguing that one action will lead to a series of negative events)
  50. Reference to the border wall
  51. "Gun control"
  52. "Cybersecurity"
  53. "Fake News"
  54. Strawman (misrepresenting the opponent's argument to make it easier to attack)
  55. Candidates going over their allotted time
  56. "China"
  57. "National security"
  58. "Economy"
  59. Mention of Hunter Biden
  60. "Women’s rights"
  61. Moderator muting a candidate's microphone
  62. "Sleepy Joe"
  63. Candidates talking over each other
  64. "COVID-19 pandemic"
  65. Technical difficulties
  66. Circular reasoning (the argument's conclusion is used as a premise)
  67. "Build Back Better"
  68. "Law and order"
  69. "Minimum wage"
  70. "Green New Deal"
  71. "Russia"
  72. Interruptions by one candidate
  73. "Tax returns"
  74. Begging the question (assuming the truth of what one is supposed to prove)
  75. Bandwagon (arguing that something is true because it is popular)
  76. "Middle class"
  77. "Student loans"
  78. Yelling or shouting
  79. "Afghanistan"
  80. Candidates avoiding answering the question directly