(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
"Obamacare"
"Afghanistan"
Yelling or shouting
"Social Security"
"Mental health"
"Minimum wage"
Slippery slope (arguing that one action will lead to a series of negative events)
Mention of Ukraine
Personal attacks or name-calling
"Fake News"
Moderator having to step in
"Voting rights"
Technical difficulties
Non sequitur (a conclusion that doesn't logically follow from the premises)
Moderator muting a candidate's microphone
"National security"
"Abortion"
"Green New Deal"
Strawman (misrepresenting the opponent's argument to make it easier to attack)
Mention of Hunter Biden
Candidates talking over each other
Candidates going over their allotted time
Post hoc ergo propter hoc (assuming that because one event followed another, it was caused by the first)
"Education"
Red herring (distracting from the main issue with an irrelevant point)
"Racial justice"
"Affordable housing"
Ad hominem (attacking the opponent instead of their argument)
"Second Amendment"
Loaded question (asking a question that contains a presupposition)
"Climate Change"
"Sleepy Joe"
"Immigration reform"
"China"
"Gas prices"
"Infrastructure"
"Foreign policy"
"Jobs"
"Veterans"
"Unemployment rate"
"Election fraud"
"LGBTQ+ rights"
"Middle class"
"Build Back Better"
"Supreme Court"
"Law and order"
Begging the question (assuming the truth of what one is supposed to prove)
"Student loans"
"Russia"
"Bipartisanship"
Crowd reactions (cheering, booing, etc.)
Candidates repeating the same point multiple times
Hasty generalization (drawing a conclusion based on insufficient evidence)
"Cybersecurity"
"Clean energy"
Appeal to tradition (arguing that something should continue because it has traditionally been done that way)
"Police reform"
Candidates avoiding answering the question directly
"Gun control"
Interruptions by one candidate
Circular reasoning (the argument's conclusion is used as a premise)
"COVID-19 pandemic"
"Women’s rights"
Use of props (charts, photos, etc.)
"Medicare"
Candidates using rehearsed one-liners or catchphrases
"Healthcare"
Appeal to emotion (using emotions rather than facts to persuade)
Awkward pauses
"Trade deals"
Appeal to authority (using the opinion of an authority figure as evidence)
Candidates making jokes or sarcastic remarks
Bandwagon (arguing that something is true because it is popular)
"Tax returns"
"Inflation"
False dilemma (presenting only two options when more exist)
